These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22661434)

  • 1. Power calculations in genetic studies.
    Evans DM; Purcell S
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2012 Jun; 2012(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 22661434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple testing and power calculations in genetic association studies.
    So HC; Sham PC
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2011 Jan; 2011(1):pdb.top95. PubMed ID: 21205861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explorations in statistics: power.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 20522895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reassessment of trial perspectives from interim data--a critical view.
    Bauer P; Koenig F
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16220517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dual test: safeguarding p-value combination tests for adaptive designs.
    Burman CF; Lisovskaja V
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):797-807. PubMed ID: 20213723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power and sample size.
    Case LD; Ambrosius WT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():377-408. PubMed ID: 18450060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Upward bias in odds ratio estimates from genome-wide association studies.
    Garner C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 17266119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seven ways to increase power without increasing N.
    Hansen WB; Collins LM
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():184-95. PubMed ID: 9243537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiplicity-adjusted sample size requirements: a strategy to maintain statistical power with Bonferroni adjustments.
    Leon AC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 65(11):1511-4. PubMed ID: 15554764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size and power calculation for molecular biology studies.
    Jung SH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 620():203-18. PubMed ID: 20652505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonreplication in genetic studies of complex diseases--lessons learned from studies of osteoporosis and tentative remedies.
    Shen H; Liu Y; Liu P; Recker RR; Deng HW
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Mar; 20(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 15746981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic association studies in Alzheimer's disease research: challenges and opportunities.
    Edland SD; Slager S; Farrer M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 14716719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical sampling and hypothesis testing in orthopaedic research.
    Bernstein J; McGuire K; Freedman KB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):55-62. PubMed ID: 12897596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
    Walters SJ
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18416448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.