139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22661763)
1. Empirical evaluation of age groups and age-subgroup analyses in pediatric randomized trials and pediatric meta-analyses.
Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Seto I; Hamm MP; Thomson D; Hartling L; Ioannidis JP; Curtis S; Constantin E; Batmanabane G; Klassen T; Williams K
Pediatrics; 2012 Jun; 129 Suppl 3():S161-84. PubMed ID: 22661763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: are most of them misleading?
Hernández AV; Boersma E; Murray GD; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW
Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 16442886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the pediatric aspects of the WHO document and meta-analysis of immunotherapy].
Ibáñez Sendín MD
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2000; 28(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 10867375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence from crossover trials: empirical evaluation and comparison against parallel arm trials.
Lathyris DN; Trikalinos TA; Ioannidis JP
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 36(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 17301102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
Korttila K; Apfel CC
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of small randomized controlled trials in surgery may be unreliable.
Rerkasem K; Rothwell PM
Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 20155790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement.
Welk B; Afshar K; MacNeily AE
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):306-9; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 16753430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Reviews in Pediatric-Gastroenterology: a systematic analysis.
Cohen S; Lubetzky R; Mimouni FB; Marom R; Mandel D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Feb; 25(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 23044810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evidence on harms in pediatric randomized clinical trials from less developed versus more developed countries is limited.
Tedesco D; Farid-Kapadia M; Offringa M; Bhutta ZA; Maldonado Y; Ioannidis JPA; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():63-72. PubMed ID: 29191447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subgroup Analyses in Reporting of Phase III Clinical Trials in Solid Tumors.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Hu X
J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(15):1697-702. PubMed ID: 25897150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation.
Vandermeer B; van der Tweel I; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Weinreich SS; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Bassler D; Fernandes RM; Askie L; Saloojee H; Baiardi P; Ellenberg SS; van der Lee JH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29321002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
