BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22661763)

  • 41. 21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Agarwal A; Rochwerg B; Sevransky JE
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Dec; 49(12):2001-2002. PubMed ID: 34582418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. RCTs of ergonomic interventions.
    Westgaard RH
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 67(4):217-8. PubMed ID: 20360193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.
    Schandelmaier S; Briel M; Varadhan R; Schmid CH; Devasenapathy N; Hayward RA; Gagnier J; Borenstein M; van der Heijden GJMG; Dahabreh IJ; Sun X; Sauerbrei W; Walsh M; Ioannidis JPA; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2020 Aug; 192(32):E901-E906. PubMed ID: 32778601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies.
    Hahn S; Williamson PR; Hutton JL; Garner P; Flynn EV
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3325-36. PubMed ID: 11122498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Generalizing from clinical trial data: a case study. The risk of suicidality among pediatric antidepressant users.
    Greenhouse JB; Kaizar EE; Kelleher K; Seltman H; Gardner W
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1801-13. PubMed ID: 18381709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prespecification of subgroup analyses and examination of treatment-subgroup interactions in cancer individual participant data meta-analyses are suboptimal.
    Gao Y; Liu M; Shi S; Niu M; Li J; Zhang J; Song F; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():156-167. PubMed ID: 34186194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An empirical study using permutation-based resampling in meta-regression.
    Gagnier JJ; Moher D; Boon H; Bombardier C; Beyene J
    Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 1():18. PubMed ID: 22587815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Authors' response: RCTs of ergonomic interventions.
    Driessen MT; Anema JR; Proper KI; van der Beek AJ
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 67(4):218-9. PubMed ID: 20360194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Meta-analysis in the assessment of treatment outcome.
    Geddes J
    J Psychopharmacol; 2006 Jul; 20(4 Suppl):67-71. PubMed ID: 16785273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A systematic review of individual patient data meta-analyses on surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ; Rovers MM
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2():52. PubMed ID: 23826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Value and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Verstraete M
    Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb; 2002; 32(5-6):278-81. PubMed ID: 13679657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: a cautionary note.
    Cuijpers P; Griffin JW; Furukawa TA
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2021 Dec; 30():e78. PubMed ID: 34852862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and subgroup analyses.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    JAMA; 2010 Apr; 303(13):1254; author reply 1254-5. PubMed ID: 20371782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interpretation of subgroup analyses in randomized trials: heterogeneity versus secondary interventions.
    VanderWeele TJ; Knol MJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 May; 154(10):680-3. PubMed ID: 21576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pediatric literature shift: Growth of meta-analyses was 23 times greater than growth of randomized trials.
    Niforatos JD; Chaitoff A; Weaver M; Feinstein MM; Johansen ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():112-114. PubMed ID: 32004671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Discrepancies among megatrials.
    Furukawa TA; Streiner DL; Hori S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 53(12):1193-9. PubMed ID: 11146264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and subgroup analyses.
    Vosk A
    JAMA; 2010 Apr; 303(13):1253; author reply 1254-5. PubMed ID: 20371781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The evaluation of different approaches to randomized clinical trials. Report on the 1987 MacArthur Foundation Network I Methodology Workshop.
    Kraemer HC; Pruyn JP
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1990 Dec; 47(12):1163-9. PubMed ID: 2147099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biostatistics primer: what a clinician ought to know: subgroup analyses.
    Barraclough H; Govindan R
    J Thorac Oncol; 2010 May; 5(5):741-6. PubMed ID: 20421767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses.
    Oxman AD; Guyatt GH
    Ann Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 116(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 1530753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.