131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22664139)
1. Hemispheric differences in VEPs to lateralised stimuli are a marker of recovery from neglect.
Di Russo F; Bozzacchi C; Matano A; Spinelli D
Cortex; 2013 Apr; 49(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 22664139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.
Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D
Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.
Kavcic V; Triplett RL; Das A; Martin T; Huxlin KR
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():82-93. PubMed ID: 25575450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alterations in visual and auditory processing in hemispatial neglect: an evoked potential follow-up study.
Tarkka IM; Luukkainen-Markkula R; Pitkänen K; Hämäläinen H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 21092746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-frequency analysis of visual evoked potentials for interhemispheric transfer time and proportion in callosal fibers of different diameters.
Ulusoy I; Halici U; Nalçaci E; Anaç I; Leblebicio Eroğlu K; Başar-Eroğlu C
Biol Cybern; 2004 Apr; 90(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 15085348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced and bilateralized visual sensory processing in the ventral stream may be a feature of normal aging.
De Sanctis P; Katz R; Wylie GR; Sehatpour P; Alexopoulos GS; Foxe JJ
Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1576-86. PubMed ID: 17478011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.
Umarova RM; Saur D; Kaller CP; Vry MS; Glauche V; Mader I; Hennig J; Weiller C
Brain; 2011 Nov; 134(Pt 11):3310-25. PubMed ID: 21948940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
Nakamura K; Oga T; Takahashi M; Kuribayashi T; Kanamori Y; Matsumiya T; Maeno Y; Yamamoto M
Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A right hemisphere advantage at early cortical stages of processing alphanumeric stimuli. Evidence from electrophysiology.
Asanowicz D; Verleger R; Kruse L; Beier K; Śmigasiewicz K
Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():40-55. PubMed ID: 28113099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemispheric differences in VEP elicited by mental arithmetic and tachistoscopically presented spatial transformation tasks.
Gille HG; Ullsperger P; Pietschmann M
Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1983 Mar; 25(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 6858591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early visual processing in neglect patients: a study with steady-state VEPs.
Angelelli P; De Luca M; Spinelli D
Neuropsychologia; 1996 Dec; 34(12):1151-7. PubMed ID: 8951825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with FMRI signals in human visual cortex.
Whittingstall K; Wilson D; Schmidt M; Stroink G
Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18841455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial neglect is associated with increased latencies of visual evoked potentials.
Spinelli D; Burr DC; Morrone MC
Vis Neurosci; 1994; 11(5):909-18. PubMed ID: 7947404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intentional gaze shift to neglected space: a compensatory strategy during recovery after unilateral spatial neglect.
Takamura Y; Imanishi M; Osaka M; Ohmatsu S; Tominaga T; Yamanaka K; Morioka S; Kawashima N
Brain; 2016 Nov; 139(11):2970-2982. PubMed ID: 27663624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs.
Verleger R; Śmigasiewicz K; Möller F
Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1096-106. PubMed ID: 21265863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemisphere asymmetry of the visually evoked potentials elicited by gratings of varying spatial frequency.
Vassilev A; Manahilov V; Mitov D; Nevskaya AA; Leushina LI
Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1991; 17(2-3):54-60. PubMed ID: 1819918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prism adaptation enhances activity of intact fronto-parietal areas in both hemispheres in neglect patients.
Saj A; Cojan Y; Vocat R; Luauté J; Vuilleumier P
Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 22154751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time-varying differences in evoked potentials elicited by high versus low spatial frequencies: a topographical and source analysis.
Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; van Engeland H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1956-66. PubMed ID: 15990359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional hemispheric asymmetries of global/local processing mirrored by the steady-state visual evoked potential.
Martens U; Hübner R
Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23246827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial frequency and right hemisphere: an electrophysiological investigation.
Rebaï M; Bernard C; Lannou J; Jouen F
Brain Cogn; 1998 Feb; 36(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9500882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
