These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22665284)

  • 1. Multiple testing in large-scale genetic studies.
    Bouaziz M; Jeanmougin M; Guedj M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():213-33. PubMed ID: 22665284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for handling multiple testing.
    Rice TK; Schork NJ; Rao DC
    Adv Genet; 2008; 60():293-308. PubMed ID: 18358325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The problem of multiple testing and solutions for genome-wide studies].
    Gyorffy B; Gyorffy A; Tulassay Z
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Mar; 146(12):559-63. PubMed ID: 15853065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the sample size requirement in genetic association tests when the proportion of false positives is controlled.
    Zou G; Zuo Y
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):687-91. PubMed ID: 16204206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An effective method for controlling false discovery and false nondiscovery rates in genome-scale RNAi screens.
    Zhang XD
    J Biomol Screen; 2010 Oct; 15(9):1116-22. PubMed ID: 20855561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On multiple-testing correction in genome-wide association studies.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 32(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 18425821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient two-stage genome-wide association designs based on false positive report probabilities.
    Kraft P
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():523-34. PubMed ID: 17094266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests.
    Fernando RL; Nettleton D; Southey BR; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Soller M
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):611-9. PubMed ID: 15020448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Universal false discovery rate estimation methodology for genome-wide association studies.
    Forner K; Lamarine M; Guedj M; Dauvillier J; Wojcik J
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(4):183-94. PubMed ID: 18073488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of influential genetic markers among a large number of candidates based on effect estimation rather than hypothesis testing: an approach for genome-wide association studies.
    Strömberg U; Björk J; Broberg K; Mertens F; Vineis P
    Epidemiology; 2008 Mar; 19(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 18300718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. Control of the false discovery rate applied to the detection of positively selected amino acid sites.
    Guindon S; Black M; Rodrigo A;
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 May; 23(5):919-26. PubMed ID: 16423864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of SSMD-based false discovery and false nondiscovery rates in genome-scale RNAi screens.
    Zhang XD; Lacson R; Yang R; Marine SD; McCampbell A; Toolan DM; Hare TR; Kajdas J; Berger JP; Holder DJ; Heyse JF; Ferrer M
    J Biomol Screen; 2010 Oct; 15(9):1123-31. PubMed ID: 20852024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical methods for expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping.
    Kendziorski CM; Chen M; Yuan M; Lan H; Attie AD
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16542225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trade-off between false positives and false negatives in the linkage analysis of complex traits.
    Todorov AA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 9358264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple hypothesis testing in genomics.
    Goeman JJ; Solari A
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(11):1946-78. PubMed ID: 24399688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of hit detection and confirmation in single and duplicate high-throughput screenings.
    Wu Z; Liu D; Sui Y
    J Biomol Screen; 2008 Feb; 13(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18216390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.