140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22665300)
21. Isotope-coded N-terminal sulfonation of peptides allows quantitative proteomic analysis with increased de novo peptide sequencing capability.
Lee YH; Han H; Chang SB; Lee SW
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2004; 18(24):3019-27. PubMed ID: 15536630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Increased quantitative proteome coverage with (13)C/(12)C-based, acid-cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag reagent and modified data acquisition scheme.
Yi EC; Li XJ; Cooke K; Lee H; Raught B; Page A; Aneliunas V; Hieter P; Goodlett DR; Aebersold R
Proteomics; 2005 Feb; 5(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 15648049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics.
Chen X; Sun L; Yu Y; Xue Y; Yang P
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 4(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17288513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Protein- versus peptide fractionation in the first dimension of two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem mass spectrometry for qualitative proteome analysis of tissue samples.
Melchior K; Tholey A; Heisel S; Keller A; Lenhof HP; Meese E; Huber CG
J Chromatogr A; 2010 Oct; 1217(40):6159-68. PubMed ID: 20810122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The application of new software tools to quantitative protein profiling via isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) and tandem mass spectrometry: II. Evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry methodologies for large-scale protein analysis, and the application of statistical tools for data analysis and interpretation.
von Haller PD; Yi E; Donohoe S; Vaughn K; Keller A; Nesvizhskii AI; Eng J; Li XJ; Goodlett DR; Aebersold R; Watts JD
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2003 Jul; 2(7):428-42. PubMed ID: 12832459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Towards multidimensional liquid chromatography separation of proteins using fluorescence and isotope-coded protein labelling for quantitative proteomics.
Tribl F; Lohaus C; Dombert T; Langenfeld E; Piechura H; Warscheid B; Meyer HE; Marcus K
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1204-11. PubMed ID: 18271069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analytical characteristics of cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag-LC-tandem mass spectrometry for quantitative proteomic studies.
Vaughn CP; Crockett DK; Lim MS; Elenitoba-Johnson KS
J Mol Diagn; 2006 Sep; 8(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 16931593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mass spectrometry for protein quantification in biomarker discovery.
Wang M; You J
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 815():199-225. PubMed ID: 22130994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Absolute quantification of proteins using standard peptides and multiple reaction monitoring.
Schmidt C; Urlaub H
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():249-65. PubMed ID: 22665306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative proteomics using 16O/18O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry.
López-Ferrer D; Ramos-Fernández A; Martínez-Bartolomé S; García-Ruiz P; Vázquez J
Proteomics; 2006 Apr; 6 Suppl 1():S4-11. PubMed ID: 16534745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SWATH enables precise label-free quantification on proteome scale.
Huang Q; Yang L; Luo J; Guo L; Wang Z; Yang X; Jin W; Fang Y; Ye J; Shan B; Zhang Y
Proteomics; 2015 Apr; 15(7):1215-23. PubMed ID: 25560523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Software for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling and data independent acquisition.
Huang X; Liu M; Nold MJ; Tian C; Fu K; Zheng J; Geromanos SJ; Ding SJ
Anal Chem; 2011 Sep; 83(18):6971-9. PubMed ID: 21834580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research.
Wiese S; Reidegeld KA; Meyer HE; Warscheid B
Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 7(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17177251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differential proteomic analysis using isotope-coded protein-labeling strategies: comparison, improvements and application to simulated microgravity effect on Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34.
Leroy B; Rosier C; Erculisse V; Leys N; Mergeay M; Wattiez R
Proteomics; 2010 Jun; 10(12):2281-91. PubMed ID: 20391527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Brain quantitative proteomics combining GeLC-MS and isotope-coded protein labeling (ICPL).
Maccarrone G; Lebar M; Martins-de-Souza D
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1156():175-85. PubMed ID: 24791988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Production and use of stable isotope-labeled proteins for absolute quantitative proteomics.
Lebert D; Dupuis A; Garin J; Bruley C; Brun V
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():93-115. PubMed ID: 21604118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics.
Guerrera IC; Kleiner O
Biosci Rep; 2005; 25(1-2):71-93. PubMed ID: 16222421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for relative quantification of protein expression.
Collier TS; Randall SM; Sarkar P; Rao BM; Dean RA; Muddiman DC
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Sep; 25(17):2524-32. PubMed ID: 21818813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative protein profiling by mass spectrometry using isotope-coded affinity tags.
Haqqani AS; Kelly JF; Stanimirovic DB
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 439():225-40. PubMed ID: 18370107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
