201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22665504)
1. Linear and nonlinear elastic modulus imaging: an application to breast cancer diagnosis.
Goenezen S; Dord JF; Sink Z; Barbone PE; Jiang J; Hall TJ; Oberai AA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Aug; 31(8):1628-37. PubMed ID: 22665504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive In-Vivo Quantification of Mechanical Heterogeneity of Invasive Breast Carcinomas.
Liu T; Babaniyi OA; Hall TJ; Barbone PE; Oberai AA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130258. PubMed ID: 26154737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elastic nonlinearity imaging.
Hall TJ; Oberait AA; Barbone PE; Sommer AM; Gokhale NH; Goenezent S; Jiang J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1967-70. PubMed ID: 19964024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of scattering media within benign and malignant breast tumors based on ultrasound texture-feature-based and Nakagami-parameter images.
Liao YY; Tsui PH; Li CH; Chang KJ; Kuo WH; Chang CC; Yeh CK
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2198-207. PubMed ID: 21626954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A constrained reconstruction technique of hyperelasticity parameters for breast cancer assessment.
Mehrabian H; Campbell G; Samani A
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7489-508. PubMed ID: 21098922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of Linear and Nonlinear Elastic Modulus Maps From Repeat Scans in the Breast.
Gendin DI; Nayak R; Wang Y; Bayat M; Fazzio RT; Oberai AA; Hall TJ; Barbone PE; Alizad A; Fatemi M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 40(2):748-757. PubMed ID: 33151880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Iterative Method for Estimating Nonlinear Elastic Constants of Tumor in Soft Tissue from Approximate Displacement Measurements.
Dastjerdi MM; Fallah A; Rashidi S
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():2374645. PubMed ID: 30723537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.
Wang Y; Bayer M; Jiang J; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3145-3159. PubMed ID: 31548103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonlinear Shear Modulus Estimation With Bi-Axial Motion Registered Local Strain.
Goswami S; Ahmed R; Doyley MM; McAleavey SA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Aug; 66(8):1292-1303. PubMed ID: 31150340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility.
Oberai AA; Gokhale NH; Goenezen S; Barbone PE; Hall TJ; Sommer AM; Jiang J
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 19182325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.
Xu H; Rao M; Varghese T; Sommer A; Baker S; Hall TJ; Sisney GA; Burnside ES
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1813-24. PubMed ID: 20800948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial Compounding Technique to Obtain Rotation Elastogram: A Feasibility Study.
Kothawala A; Chandramoorthi S; Reddy NRK; Thittai AK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1290-1301. PubMed ID: 28433440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative Elastic Modulus Imaging Using Sector Ultrasound Data for Abdominal Applications: An Evaluation of Strategies and Feasibility.
Peng B; Wang Y; Yang W; Varghese T; Jiang J
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1432-40. PubMed ID: 27411219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience.
Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yun MB; Gang YZ; Hua Z
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1447-52. PubMed ID: 22799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
