211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22665660)
1. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
Capper JL; Hayes DJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.
Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):4249-61. PubMed ID: 21803973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.
White RR; Capper JL
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5801-12. PubMed ID: 24146151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007.
Capper JL; Cady RA; Bauman DE
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2160-7. PubMed ID: 19286817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.
Capper JL; Cady RA
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31622980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems.
Capper JL
Animals (Basel); 2012 Apr; 2(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 26486913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: A role for beef cattle in sustainable U.S. food production1.
Gleason CB; White RR
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):4010-4020. PubMed ID: 31414131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the environmental impact of Jersey compared with Holstein milk for cheese production.
Capper JL; Cady RA
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):165-76. PubMed ID: 22192195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.
White RR; Brady M; Capper JL; McNamara JP; Johnson KA
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3197-211. PubMed ID: 26115306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling the effects of steroid implant use on the environmental and economic sustainability of Brazilian beef production.
Capper JL; De Carvalho TB; Hancock AS; Sá Filho OG; Odeyemi I; Bartram DJ
Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 5(4):txab144. PubMed ID: 34632312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Rotz CA; Asem-Hiablie S; Dillon J; Bonifacio H
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2509-19. PubMed ID: 26020346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Production systems--an example from Brazil.
Ferraz JB; Felício PE
Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20374781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic and environmental impact of four levels of concentrate supplementation in grazing dairy herds.
Soder KJ; Rotz CA
J Dairy Sci; 2001 Nov; 84(11):2560-72. PubMed ID: 11768100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Economic dimension and environmental impact of beef production in France].
Peyraud JL
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2011 Nov; 195(8):1813-24; discussion 1824-5. PubMed ID: 22844743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
