These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22666491)

  • 1. FunFOLDQA: a quality assessment tool for protein-ligand binding site residue predictions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e38219. PubMed ID: 22666491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FunFOLD: an improved automated method for the prediction of ligand binding residues using 3D models of proteins.
    Roche DB; Tetchner SJ; McGuffin LJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():160. PubMed ID: 21575183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.
    Schmidt T; Haas J; Gallo Cassarino T; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):126-36. PubMed ID: 21987472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The binding site distance test score: a robust method for the assessment of predicted protein binding sites.
    Roche DB; Tetchner SJ; McGuffin LJ
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2920-1. PubMed ID: 20861025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of ligand binding residue predictions in CASP8.
    López G; Ezkurdia I; Tress ML
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):138-46. PubMed ID: 19714771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.
    Gallo Cassarino T; Bordoli L; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):154-63. PubMed ID: 24339001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of ligand binding sites using homologous structures and conservation at CASP8.
    Wass MN; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):147-51. PubMed ID: 19626715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In silico Identification and Characterization of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1414():1-21. PubMed ID: 27094282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The FunFOLD2 server for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W303-7. PubMed ID: 23761453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category.
    López G; Rojas A; Tress M; Valencia A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():165-74. PubMed ID: 17654548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of ligand binding using an approach designed to accommodate diversity in protein-ligand interactions.
    Marsh L
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23215. PubMed ID: 21860668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The IntFOLD server: an integrated web resource for protein fold recognition, 3D model quality assessment, intrinsic disorder prediction, domain prediction and ligand binding site prediction.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; Tetchner SJ; McGuffin LJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jul; 39(Web Server issue):W171-6. PubMed ID: 21459847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model quality assessment using distance constraints from alignments.
    Paluszewski M; Karplus K
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):540-9. PubMed ID: 19003987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting cryptic ligand binding sites based on normal modes guided conformational sampling.
    Zheng W
    Proteins; 2021 Apr; 89(4):416-426. PubMed ID: 33244830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.
    Brylinski M; Lee SY; Zhou H; Skolnick J
    J Struct Biol; 2011 Mar; 173(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 20850544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9.
    Kryshtafovych A; Fidelis K; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):91-106. PubMed ID: 21997462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment.
    Yang J; Roy A; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(20):2588-95. PubMed ID: 23975762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the quality of modelled 3D protein structures using the ModFOLD server.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1137():83-103. PubMed ID: 24573476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.
    Wass MN; Kelley LA; Sternberg MJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jul; 38(Web Server issue):W469-73. PubMed ID: 20513649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.