These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22666765)

  • 1. 1-Year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: effect of enamel etching.
    Azevedo CG; De Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Chan DC
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22666765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M; Voet M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Van Ende A; Van Meerbeek B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 22707232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Apr; 12(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
    Türkmen C; Durkan M; Cimilli H; Öksüz M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 21710095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
    Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years.
    Schenke F; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Moder D; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):451-61. PubMed ID: 21431338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
    Vaz RR; Hipólito VD; D'Alpino PH; Goes MF
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 22044733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
    Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
    J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.