These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22666843)

  • 21. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
    Ortega R; Gonzalo E; Gomez-Polo M; Suárez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of finish line curvature on marginal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns and metal-ceramic crowns.
    Tao J; Han D
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):745-52. PubMed ID: 19862401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinically relevant fracture testing of all-ceramic crowns.
    Øilo M; Kvam K; Tibballs JE; Gjerdet NR
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):815-23. PubMed ID: 23746750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation in five ceramic restoration fabricating techniques.
    Ural C; Burgaz Y; Saraç D
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(7):585-90. PubMed ID: 20614046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thermal distortion of different materials in crown construction.
    Castellani D; Baccetti T; Clauser C; Bernardini UD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 7990040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems before and after cementation.
    Borges GA; Faria JS; Agarwal P; Spohr AM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Miranzi BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 22616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
    Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system.
    Grey NJ; Piddock V; Wilson MA
    J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 8425983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Difference between selected and obtained shade for metal-ceramic crown systems.
    Omar H; Atta O; El-Mowafy O
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):502-7. PubMed ID: 18833856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns.
    Pera P; Gilodi S; Bassi F; Carossa S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 7853254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE; Goldstein GR; Hittelman EL; Clark EA
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
    Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings.
    Colpani JT; Borba M; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Feb; 29(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 23218747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.