BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22666984)

  • 1. How the AMA benefits CSMS--and you.
    Katz MC
    Conn Med; 2012 Mar; 76(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 22666984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Federal Trade Commission vs. AMA, CSMS and NHCMA. Abstract of the FTC brief.
    Conn Med; 1978 Mar; 42(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 630875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subject: the AMA--should MSMA remain unified or deunify? Benefits of remaining unified with the AMA.
    Anderson RS
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 48(4):111-2. PubMed ID: 17941259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In their own words. The College and the AMA--one house, separate rooms.
    McGinnis LS
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Nov; 83(11):28-31, 46. PubMed ID: 10338861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bruce A. Scott, MD. Young physicians designated position, AMA board of trustees.
    Scott BA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 97(7):304-9. PubMed ID: 10412258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maybe AMA should be more like TMA.
    Tenery RM
    Tex Med; 2001 Nov; 97(11):9-10. PubMed ID: 11762091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AMA, MGMA to team up.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Apr; 25(14):3. PubMed ID: 10141319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should Med-Chi members also be AMA members?
    Taylor B
    Md State Med J; 1979 Apr; 28(4):35-45. PubMed ID: 439938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and the New Haven County Medical Association, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: October 7, 1980.
    Conn Med; 1980 Dec; 44(12):801-6. PubMed ID: 7449374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The voice of experience. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
    Bristow LR
    Internist; 1988; 29(5):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10287831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A look at the significance of the AAPM-AMA relationship.
    Follett K
    Pain Med; 2008 Sep; 9(6):629-30. PubMed ID: 18816328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the AMA bridge the gap between the specialties?. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig.
    Painter JT
    Internist; 1994 Feb; 35(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 10132088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From my perspective.
    Russell TR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 91(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 18551973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How the AMA represents you.
    Kahn CJ
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1992 May; 79(5):329-30. PubMed ID: 1500916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where AMA stands on the issues.
    Am Med News; 1979 Jun; 22(25):suppl 14. PubMed ID: 10242447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The AMA in Washington: is it doing its job?
    Brazda JF
    Am Med News; 1979 Jun; 22(25):suppl 13, 15. PubMed ID: 10242446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Membership: it is not just analog anymore.
    Katz MC
    Conn Med; 2013 Sep; 77(8):505-6. PubMed ID: 24156184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How physicians fight for their point of view.
    Stacey J
    Am Med News; 1979 Jun; 22(25):suppl 4-6. PubMed ID: 10242450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Change of heart? AMA rethinking assertion there are too many docs.
    Romano M
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Dec; 33(49):14-5. PubMed ID: 14712596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PRO update. Transition from the third to fourth scope of work.
    Baker NA
    Mich Med; 1992 Apr; 91(4):42, 45-7. PubMed ID: 1614338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.