274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22667060)
1. The KPG index--a novel 3D classification system for maxillary canine impactions.
San Martín DE; English JD; Kau CH; Gallerano RL; McGrory KR; Salas AM; Bouquot J; Xia JJ
Tex Dent J; 2012 Mar; 129(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 22667060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of a novel CBCT-based 3D classification system for maxillary canine impactions in orthodontics: the KPG index.
Dalessandri D; Migliorati M; Rubiano R; Visconti L; Contardo L; Di Lenarda R; Martin C
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():921234. PubMed ID: 24235889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines.
Dalessandri D; Migliorati M; Visconti L; Contardo L; Kau CH; Martin C
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():537620. PubMed ID: 25126566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of a new prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines, 'Easy box': A cone-beam computed tomographic study.
P MS; Sundareswaran S; Mohammed F; Jisha B
J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 36113095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved eruption path quantification and treatment time prognosis in alignment of impacted maxillary canines using CBCT imaging.
Schubert M; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 29846571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional position of impacted maxillary canines: Prevalence, associated pathology and introduction to a new classification system.
Grisar K; Piccart F; Al-Rimawi AS; Basso I; Politis C; Jacobs R
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 31943949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based evaluation of experts' opinions on impacted maxillary canines forced eruption using CBCT.
Miresmaeili A; Farhadian N; Mollabashi V; Yousefi F
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25992993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional assessment of the eruption path of the canine in individuals with bone-grafted alveolar clefts using cone beam computed tomography.
Oberoi S; Gill P; Chigurupati R; Hoffman WY; Hatcher DC; Vargervik K
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Sep; 47(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 20184425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 25726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in the presence of a palatally-impacted canine].
Waugh RL
Orthod Fr; 2014 Dec; 85(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 25443408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary transverse dimensions in subjects with and without impacted canines: A comparative cone-beam computed tomography study.
Arboleda-Ariza N; Schilling J; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 30268260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography- and Two Dimensional-based Interpretations of Maxillary Canine Impactions using a Panel of Orthodontically Trained Observers.
Al-Homsi HK; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):648-56. PubMed ID: 26423501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel 3D classification system for canine impactions--the KPG index.
Kau CH; Pan P; Gallerano RL; English JD
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 19449307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional localization of impacted canines and root resorption assessment using cone beam computed tomography.
Almuhtaseb E; Mao J; Mahony D; Bader R; Zhang ZX
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2014 Jun; 34(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 24939311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
