These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22667808)

  • 1. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
    Park K; Pyo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: experimental evidence of its perceptual basis.
    Ratcliff JJ; Lassiter GD; Schmidt HC; Snyder CJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 17154769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?
    Hasel LE; Kassin SM
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Videotaped interrogations and confessions: a simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials.
    Lassiter GD; Geers AL; Handley IM; Weiland PE; Munhall PJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):867-74. PubMed ID: 12395811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 23876091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques.
    Lidén M; Gräns M; Juslin P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):336-354. PubMed ID: 29963877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Camera perspective bias in videotaped confessions: evidence that visual attention is a mediator.
    Ware LJ; Lassiter GD; Patterson SM; Ransom MR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 18590374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead.
    Kassin SM; Drizin SA; Grisso T; Gudjonsson GH; Leo RA; Redlich AD
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Feb; 34(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 20112057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
    Shifton JJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?
    Leo RA; Liu B
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):381-99. PubMed ID: 19405041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis.
    Kassin SM; Neumann K
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 9374602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
    Moffa MS; Platania J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
    Greenspan R; Scurich N
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: ethics-related implications and neurobiological correlates of false confessions in juveniles.
    Weinstock R; Thompson C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19767499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do you see? Understanding perceptions of police use of force videos as a function of the camera perspective.
    Korva N; Bennell C; Lalumière ML; Karimullah M
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 May; 40(3):480-503. PubMed ID: 35608035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
    Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
    Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
    Perillo JT; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.