These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22667813)

  • 1. A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 22667813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Hart SD; Cooke DJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 23322617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mathematical proof and example that Bayes's Theorem is fundamental to actuarial estimates of sexual recidivism risk.
    Donaldson T; Wollert R
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Jun; 20(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 18490482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From group data to useful probabilities: the relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 25770285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the relative excess risk due to interaction: a bayesian approach.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 21228700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals.
    Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22499708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence.
    Hart SD; Michie C; Cooke DJ
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 2007 May; 49():s60-5. PubMed ID: 17470944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Innumeracy and unpacking: bridging the nomothetic/idiographic divide in violence risk assessment.
    Scurich N; Monahan J; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 22545583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian network for risk of diarrhea associated with the use of recycled water.
    Donald M; Cook A; Mengersen K
    Risk Anal; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1672-85. PubMed ID: 19883393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayes and base rates: what is an informative prior for actuarial violence risk assessment?
    Harris GT; Rice ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):103-24. PubMed ID: 23338935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates.
    Hespanhol L; Vallio CS; Costa LM; Saragiotto BT
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2019; 23(4):290-301. PubMed ID: 30638956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal model S(I)=0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals.
    Pillonetto G; Sparacino G; Magni P; Bellazzi R; Cobelli C
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2002 Mar; 282(3):E564-73. PubMed ID: 11832358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Notes regarding confidence intervals and statistics for standardized mortality ratios and survival curves in the insurance industry.
    Winsemius DK
    J Insur Med; 2006; 38(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16642638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.
    Sreenivasan S; Kirkish P; Garrick T; Weinberger LE; Phenix A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 11196254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.
    Price RM; Bonett DG
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5497-508. PubMed ID: 18781560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved estimates of floating absolute risk.
    Plummer M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 14695642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.