These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22667813)

  • 21. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.
    Johnson VE; Cook JD
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification accuracy of actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Neller DJ; Frederick RI
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):141-53. PubMed ID: 23322608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reduced sampling schedule for the glucose minimal model: importance of Bayesian estimation.
    Magni P; Sparacino G; Bellazzi R; Cobelli C
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2006 Jan; 290(1):E177-E184. PubMed ID: 16144816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of catastrophic risk using Bayesian network constructed from domain knowledge and spatial data.
    Li L; Wang J; Leung H; Jiang C
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1157-75. PubMed ID: 20497388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence.
    Miaou SP; Song JJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jul; 37(4):699-720. PubMed ID: 15949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy.
    Ewell M
    Stat Med; 1996 Nov 15-30; 15(21-22):2379-92. PubMed ID: 8931208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Bayesian approach to prospective binary outcome studies with misclassification in a binary risk factor.
    Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3463-77. PubMed ID: 16237661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test.
    Kruschke JK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):573-603. PubMed ID: 22774788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian hierarchical approach to estimate insulin sensitivity by minimal model.
    Agbaje OF; Luzio SD; Albarrak AI; Lunn DJ; Owens DR; Hovorka R
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Nov; 105(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 12790795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
    Kopylev L; Chen C; White P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 35(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 16446352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An expanded Fermi solution for microbial risk assessment.
    Peleg M; Normand MD; Horowitz J; Corradini MG
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 113(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 17014921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian inference on the patient population size given list mismatches.
    Wang X; He CZ; Sun D
    Stat Med; 2005 Jan; 24(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 15532076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alice in actuarial-land: through the looking glass of changing Static-99 norms.
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Frances A; Cusworth-Walker S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 20852227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the likelihood of an important clinical outcome: new insights from a comparison of clinical and actuarial judgment.
    Rakow T; Vincent C; Bull K; Harvey N
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(3):262-82. PubMed ID: 15951454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian methods of confidence interval construction for the population attributable risk from cross-sectional studies.
    Pirikahu S; Jones G; Hazelton ML; Heuer C
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(18):3117-30. PubMed ID: 26799685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Accurate interpretation of point estimates, confidence intervals, and hypothesis contrasts in public health].
    Scotto MG; Tobías-Garcés A
    Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 14974295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.