These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

891 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22667992)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes.
    Liew D; De Abreu Lourenço R; Adena M; Chim L; Aylward P
    Clin Ther; 2013 Aug; 35(8):1110-1117.e9. PubMed ID: 23891361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antiplatelet therapy for high-risk acute coronary syndromes: clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone.
    Schleinitz MD; Heidenreich PA
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Feb; 142(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 15710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clopidogrel used in combination with aspirin compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Main C; Palmer S; Griffin S; Jones L; Orton V; Sculpher M; Henderson R; Sudlow C; Hawkins N; Riemsma R
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Oct; 8(40):iii-iv, xv-xvi, 1-141. PubMed ID: 15461878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and planned percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction TRITON-TIMI 38.
    Mahoney EM; Wang K; Arnold SV; Proskorovsky I; Wiviott S; Antman E; Braunwald E; Cohen DJ
    Circulation; 2010 Jan; 121(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 20026770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term cost effectiveness of early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel given for up to one year after percutaneous coronary intervention results: from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial.
    Beinart SC; Kolm P; Veledar E; Zhang Z; Mahoney EM; Bouin O; Gabriel S; Jackson J; Chen R; Caro J; Steinhubl S; Topol E; Weintraub WS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 46(5):761-9. PubMed ID: 16139122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in Canada: a long-term analysis based on the CURE trial.
    Kolm P; Yuan Y; Veledar E; Mehta SR; O'Brien JA; Weintraub WS
    Can J Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 23(13):1037-42. PubMed ID: 17985004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term clopidogrel therapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Heeg BM; Peters RJ; Botteman M; van Hout BA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(9):769-82. PubMed ID: 17803335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A cost-utility analysis of clopidogrel in patients with ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in the UK.
    Karnon J; Holmes MW; Williams R; Bakhai A; Brennan A
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 19106007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of prasugrel in a US managed care population.
    Mauskopf JA; Graham JB; Bae JP; Ramaswamy K; Zagar AJ; Magnuson EA; Cohen DJ; Meadows ES
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(1):166-74. PubMed ID: 22066985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.
    Zhang L; Lin Z; Yin H; Liu J; Xuan J
    Clin Ther; 2018 Dec; 40(12):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 30470579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial.
    Fox KA; Mehta SR; Peters R; Zhao F; Lakkis N; Gersh BJ; Yusuf S;
    Circulation; 2004 Sep; 110(10):1202-8. PubMed ID: 15313956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of aspirin and clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitors for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Hsiao FY; Tsai YW; Huang WF; Wen YW; Chen PF; Chang PY; Kuo KN
    Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 19843493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole for the prevention of occlusive vascular events (review of Technology Appraisal No. 90): a systematic review and economic analysis.
    Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Martin Saborido C; Oyee J; Blundell M; Dundar Y; Dickson R; Proudlove C; Fisher M
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(31):1-178. PubMed ID: 21888837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of different treatment durations of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and value of information analysis.
    Rogowski W; Burch J; Palmer S; Craigs C; Golder S; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-77. PubMed ID: 19573471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Colombia.
    Mejía A; Senior JM; Ceballos M; Atehortúa S; Toro JM; Saldarriaga C; Mejía ME; Ramírez C
    Biomedica; 2015; 35(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26844442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using clopidogrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: a cost-utility analysis in Spain.
    Latour-Pérez J; Navarro-Ruiz A; Ridao-López M; Cervera-Montes M
    Value Health; 2004; 7(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 14720130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Economic analysis of ticagrelor therapy from a U.S. perspective: results from the PLATO study.
    Cowper PA; Pan W; Anstrom KJ; Kaul P; Wallentin L; Davidson-Ray L; Nikolic E; Janzon M; Levin LÅ; Cannon CP; Harrington RA; Mark DB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 65(5):465-76. PubMed ID: 25660925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The cost-effectiveness of dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a Swedish analysis of the CREDO trial.
    Ringborg A; Lindgren P; Jönsson B
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Dec; 6(4):354-6, 358-62. PubMed ID: 16267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutenaous coronary intervention: a Spanish model-based cost effectiveness analysis.
    Davies A; Sculpher M; Barrett A; Huete T; Sacristán JA; Dilla T
    Farm Hosp; 2013; 37(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 24010692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in STEMI patients in the Netherlands: a model based on the CLARITY trial.
    Thurston SJ; Heeg B; de Charro F; van Hout B
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Mar; 26(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 20070142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.