These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2266862)

  • 41. Evidence for superior encoding of detailed visual memories in deaf signers.
    Craig M; Dewar M; Turner G; Collier T; Kapur N
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):9097. PubMed ID: 35641543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Visual and "phonetic" coding of movement: evidence from american sign language.
    Poizner H
    Science; 1981 May; 212(4495):691-3. PubMed ID: 17739403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The written recall of printed stories by severely deaf children.
    Banks J; Gray C; Fyfe R
    Br J Educ Psychol; 1990 Jun; 60 ( Pt 2)():192-206. PubMed ID: 2378809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers.
    Emmorey K; Thompson R; Colvin R
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 18832075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of attention and laterality on motion and orientation discrimination in deaf signers.
    Bosworth RG; Petrich JA; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23455437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Phonetics of Head and Body Movement in the Realization of American Sign Language Signs.
    Tyrone ME; Mauk CE
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(2):120-40. PubMed ID: 27225639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain.
    Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Cardin V; Capek CM; Woll B; Rönnberg J
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 26800983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cortical representation of sign language: comparison of deaf signers and hearing non-signers.
    Levänen S; Uutela K; Salenius S; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2001 Jun; 11(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11375912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of syntactic order on serial-recall performance of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects.
    Tomblin JB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Sep; 20(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 904304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Functional changes in people with different hearing status and experiences of using Chinese sign language: an fMRI study.
    Li Q; Xia S; Zhao F; Qi J
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 50():51-60. PubMed ID: 24958241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Response bias reveals enhanced attention to inferior visual field in signers of American Sign Language.
    Dye MW; Seymour JL; Hauser PC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):1067-76. PubMed ID: 26708522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dissociating linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural communication in the brain.
    MacSweeney M; Campbell R; Woll B; Giampietro V; David AS; McGuire PK; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1605-18. PubMed ID: 15275917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phonetic coding in marginally competent readers.
    Brown RM; Sanocki T; Schrot D
    J Gen Psychol; 1983 Jul; 109(1st Half):87-94. PubMed ID: 6619819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns.
    Best CT; Mathur G; Miranda KA; Lillo-Martin D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):747-62. PubMed ID: 20348580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Language specificity in lexical organization: evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of American Sign Language and English.
    Hanson VL; Feldman LB
    Mem Cognit; 1989 May; 17(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 2725266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sign language and Chinese characters on visual-spatial memory: a literature review.
    Flaherty M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Dec; 97(3 Pt 1):797-802. PubMed ID: 14738343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory.
    Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18353759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
    Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Recall performance on a central-incidental memory task by profoundly deaf children.
    Bebko JM; Lacasse MA; Turk H; Oyen AS
    Am Ann Deaf; 1992 Jul; 137(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 1414867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.