These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22669738)

  • 1. [Data quality of unsupervised endothelial cell counting vs. reading centre analysis in multicentric clinical trials].
    Böhringer D; Hettich L; Maier PC; Reinhard T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Jun; 229(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 22669738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
    Lass JH; Gal RL; Ruedy KJ; Benetz BA; Beck RW; Baratz KH; Holland EJ; Kalajian A; Kollman C; Manning FJ; Mannis MJ; McCoy K; Montoya M; Stulting D; Xing D;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15745770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal endothelium evaluation with 2 noncontact specular microscopes and their semiautomated methods of analysis.
    de Sanctis U; Machetta F; Razzano L; Dalmasso P; Grignolo FM
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16783136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Further analysis of assessments of the coefficient of variation of corneal endothelial cell areas from specular microscopic images.
    Doughty MJ; Aakre BM
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Sep; 91(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 18537989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endothelial cell density in donor corneas: a comparison of automatic software programs with manual counting.
    Hirneiss C; Schumann RG; Grüterich M; Welge-Luessen UC; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Cornea; 2007 Jan; 26(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 17198018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The endothelial sample size analysis in corneal specular microscopy clinical examinations.
    Abib FC; Holzchuh R; Schaefer A; Schaefer T; Godois R
    Cornea; 2012 May; 31(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 22333658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?
    Doughty MJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Jan; 91(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18045256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Automated analyser of organ cultured corneal endothelial mosaic].
    Gain P; Thuret G; Chiquet C; Gavet Y; Turc PH; Théillère C; Acquart S; Le Petit JC; Maugery J; Campos L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 May; 25(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 12048509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Endothelial keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: quantitative and qualitative morphometry using automated video image analysis].
    Seitz B; Müller EE; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 207(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 7474785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eye bank corneas.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Zhao M; Acquart S; Péoc'h M; Garraud O; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3077-82. PubMed ID: 17591876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The methods of analysis of the endothelial microscopy].
    Loukotová V; Hlinomazová Z; Horácková M; Vlková E
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2007 May; 63(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 17621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy.
    van Schaick W; van Dooren BT; Mulder PG; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Cornea; 2005 Jul; 24(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelium with three different specular microscopes.
    Landesz M; Kamps A; Slart R; Siertsema JV; van Rij G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 8549239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semiautomated noncontact specular microscope.
    Doughty MJ
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1196-203. PubMed ID: 23792438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Manual endothelial cell enumeration for transplanted corneas in comparison to software controlled, automatic enumeration].
    Kohlhof JK; Ruprecht KW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Jun; 221(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 15236107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal thickness and endothelial cell characteristics in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Filosa ML; De Bernardo M; Ventriglia VM; Cecio MR; Politano L
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 19969362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endothelial cells analysis with the TOPCON specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Cheung SW; Cho P
    Curr Eye Res; 2000 Oct; 21(4):788-98. PubMed ID: 11120569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.