These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22669738)

  • 21. [Long-term changes of corneal endothelial cells with radial keratotomy].
    Zhao L; Wang YL; Liu P; Liu X
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 44(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 19035241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standard microlithographic mosaics to assess endothelial cell counting methods by light microscopy in eye banks using organ culture.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Racine GA; Pons D; Brun G; Parriaux O; Peoc'h M; Acquart S; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4373-7. PubMed ID: 17003428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium.
    Doughty MJ; Oblak E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 18201335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of semi-automated center-dot and fully automated endothelial cell analyses from specular microscopy images.
    Maruoka S; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Katakami C; Tabuchi H; Chikama T; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 38(6):2495-2507. PubMed ID: 29086325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and noncontact specular microscopy in assessing corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Parisi L; Felletti M; Brusini P
    Cornea; 2011 Jul; 30(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 21150426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of data from the rostock cornea module of the heidelberg retina tomograph, the oculus pentacam, and the endothelial cell microscope.
    Rieth S; Engel F; Bühner E; Uhlmann S; Wiedemann P; Foja C
    Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 20098314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of corneal endothelial cells after ECCE and phacoemulsification of the lens].
    Trnavec B; Cuvala J; Cernák A; Vodrázková E
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1997 Aug; 53(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 9377317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial results of endothelial cell counts after Artisan lens for phakic eyes: an evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration Ophtec Study.
    Pop M; Payette Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 15019381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Endothelial evaluation of corneal transplants by digital imaging].
    Reinhard T; Spelsberg H; Holzwarth D; Dahmen N; Godehardt E; Sundmacher R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Jun; 214(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 10427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endothelial morphometry by image analysis of corneas organ cultured at 31 degrees C.
    Acquart S; Gain P; Zhao M; Gavet Y; Defreyn A; Piselli S; Garraud O; Thuret G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 51(3):1356-64. PubMed ID: 19850847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Malay eyes.
    Mohammad-Salih PA
    Med J Malaysia; 2011 Oct; 66(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 22299546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density estimated with 2 noncontact specular microscopes.
    Goldich Y; Marcovich AL; Barkana Y; Hartstein M; Morad Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 20175056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Topcon SP 1000 and Image-NET systems. A comparison of four methods for evaluating corneal endothelial cell density.
    Vecchi M; Braccio L; Orsoni JG
    Cornea; 1996 May; 15(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 8713930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of a Reliable Automated Algorithm for the Morphometric Analysis of Human Corneal Endothelium.
    Scarpa F; Ruggeri A
    Cornea; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 27310881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of the ConfoScan3 for corneal endothelial morphology analysis.
    Sheng H; Parker EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 17873775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endometrial cell counts in recurrent miscarriage: a comparison of counting methods.
    Drury JA; Nik H; van Oppenraaij RH; Tang AW; Turner MA; Quenby S
    Histopathology; 2011 Dec; 59(6):1156-62. PubMed ID: 22175895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis.
    Patel SV; McLaren JW; Bachman LA; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1042-7. PubMed ID: 20520534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelium during cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.
    Adina B
    Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 18714496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Regression analysis of corneal endothelium after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty].
    Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Blüthner K; Küchle M; Seitz B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Jun; 216(6):393-9; discussion 400. PubMed ID: 10919119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Transplant endothelium and measuring corneal thickness after non-high-risk keratoplasty with briefly or long-term preserved corneal donor tissue].
    Nguyen NX; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Graupner M; Kus MM; Blüthner K; Küchle M; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Sep; 215(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 10528282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.