These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22669738)

  • 41. Does endothelial cell density correlate with corneal diameter in a group of young adults?
    Giasson CJ; Gosselin L; Masella A; Forcier P
    Cornea; 2008 Jul; 27(6):640-3. PubMed ID: 18580253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period.
    Bourne WM; Nelson LR; Hodge DO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Mar; 38(3):779-82. PubMed ID: 9071233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems.
    Szaflik JP
    Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 17457193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In-vivo slit scanning confocal microscopy of normal corneas in Indian eyes.
    Vanathi M; Tandon R; Sharma N; Titiyal JS; Pandey RM; Vajpayee RB
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Sep; 51(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 14601847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Inherent errors of the fixed-frame counting method for corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks.
    Campolmi N; Acquart S; He Z; Gavet Y; Jullienne R; Naigeon N; Bernard A; Forest F; Péoc'h M; Thuret G; Gain P
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2014 Sep; 15(3):451-9. PubMed ID: 24292237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quality Control in the Corneal Bank with Artificial Intelligence: Comparison of a New Deep Learning-based Approach with Conventional Endothelial Cell Counting by the "Rhine-Tec Endothelial Analysis System".
    Dreesbach M; Böhringer D; Betancor PK; Glegola M; Maier PC; Reinhard T; Heinzelmann S
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2024 Jun; 241(6):734-740. PubMed ID: 38574759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience.
    Thuret G; Manissolle C; Acquart S; Le Petit JC; Maugery J; Campos-Guyotat L; Doughty MJ; Gain P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 87(12):1481-6. PubMed ID: 14660458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Morphometric Analyses by a New Slit-Lamp Endothelial Biomicroscope.
    Ferraro L; Cozza F; Scialdone A; Borghesi A; Tavazzi S
    Cornea; 2016 Oct; 35(10):1347-54. PubMed ID: 27490047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reliability and reproducibility of corneal endothelial image analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy.
    Imre L; Nagymihály A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 239(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 11482339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improved Interchangeability with Different Corneal Specular Microscopes for Quantitative Endothelial Cell Analysis.
    van Rijn GA; Wijnen CJF; van Dooren BT; Cheng YY; Beenakker JM; Luyten GP
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():61-70. PubMed ID: 32021069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Errors in counting blood cells].
    ZACEK A
    Lek List; 1949 Oct; 4(20):490-5. PubMed ID: 15391518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 400 years and (re)counting.
    Malcom SM
    Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6459):1221. PubMed ID: 31604212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Donor Cornea Endothelial Cell Density Determined by Eye Banks and by a Central Reading Center in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.
    Benetz BA; Stoeger CG; Patel SV; OʼBrien RC; Szczotka-Flynn LB; Ayala AR; Maguire MG; Menegay HJ; Bedard P; Clover JM; Gupta PC; McCoy KE; Song JC; Lass JH;
    Cornea; 2019 Apr; 38(4):426-432. PubMed ID: 30664048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Connection of histological corneal endothelial cell count with endothelial cell density before penetrating keratoplasty.
    Lang SJ; Freysoldt A; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Auw-Haedrich C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 254(10):1993-1997. PubMed ID: 27515940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell measurements by two non-contact specular microscopes.
    Gasser L; Reinhard T; Böhringer D
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():87. PubMed ID: 26219961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cell-by-cell alignment of repeated specular microscopy images from the same eye.
    Böhringer D; Lang S; Reinhard T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59261. PubMed ID: 23516618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Data quality of unsupervised endothelial cell counting vs. reading centre analysis in multicentric clinical trials].
    Böhringer D; Hettich L; Maier PC; Reinhard T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Jun; 229(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 22669738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of corneal endothelial image analysis by Konan SP8000 noncontact and Bio-Optics Bambi systems.
    Benetz BA; Diaconu E; Bowlin SJ; Oak SS; Laing RA; Lass JH
    Cornea; 1999 Jan; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 9894940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
    Lass JH; Gal RL; Ruedy KJ; Benetz BA; Beck RW; Baratz KH; Holland EJ; Kalajian A; Kollman C; Manning FJ; Mannis MJ; McCoy K; Montoya M; Stulting D; Xing D;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15745770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measurement area and repeatability of semiautomated assessment of corneal endothelium in the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system.
    Ding X; Huang Q; Zheng Y; Jiang Y; Huang S; He M
    Cornea; 2012 Oct; 31(10):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22902488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.