These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2267030)
1. Impact of federalism on the state legislature. Goldwater M Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(6):404-7. PubMed ID: 2267030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New federalism and health policy. Lee PR; Estes CL Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1983 Jul; (468):88-102. PubMed ID: 10261431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of federalism on the State Legislature. Goldwater M Md Nurse; 1991 Sep; 10(6):2-3. PubMed ID: 1921512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health policy roundtable--view from the state legislature: translating research into policy. Greenlick MR; Goldberg B; Lopes P; Tallon J Health Serv Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):337-46. PubMed ID: 15762894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Battling for national health reform. DiVenere L; Davis MC Caring; 1993 Mar; 12(3):12-20, 22, 24-6. PubMed ID: 10123976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The form and context of federalism: meanings for health care financing. France G J Health Polit Policy Law; 2008 Aug; 33(4):649-705. PubMed ID: 18617671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the "New Federalism". Nathan RP Bull N Y Acad Med; 1986; 62(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 3456807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Clinton election: implications for healthcare. Cox WJ Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):16-8, 29. PubMed ID: 10123564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulation and federalism: legal impediments to state health care reform. Parmet WE Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(1-2):121-44. PubMed ID: 8368199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short report. How provincial and territorial legislators view tobacco and tobacco control: findings from a Canadian study. de Guia NA; Cohen JE; Ashley MJ; Ferrence R; Northrup DA; Pollard JS Chronic Dis Can; 1998; 19(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 9664026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stepping up to bat: states take the lead on health policy. Sorian R J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(3):14a-16a. PubMed ID: 10118221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The arduous road to health reform. Elwood TW NAHAM Manage J; 1992; 18(2):23-4. PubMed ID: 10122842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State of the ballot battles. Medical liability reform, funds to support children's hospitals, ER services and stem-cell research among measures in voters' hands. Taylor M Mod Healthc; 2004 Oct; 34(43):22-5. PubMed ID: 15554012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The dance of federalism: power to the people. Halamandaris VJ Caring; 2001 Aug; 20(8):44, 43. PubMed ID: 11499217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who's to blame for the policy gridlock in Washington? Doherty RB Internist; 1992; 33(7):22-4, 28. PubMed ID: 10119513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A postelection look at healthcare reform. White JH Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10123563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Change of government and health services policy in Victoria, 1992-93 [see comment]. Barraclough S; Smith J Aust Health Rev; 1994; 17(4):7-21. PubMed ID: 10140593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the new federalism. Roberts JF Bull N Y Acad Med; 1986; 62(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 3082394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs. Somin I Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Policy watch. Watch the states, too! Gebbie KM AIDS Read; 2003 Aug; 13(8):360-1. PubMed ID: 14524319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]