These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22670632)

  • 1. When far becomes near: shared environments activate action simulation.
    Griffiths D; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1241-9. PubMed ID: 22670632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: hand-centred effects.
    Griffiths D; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2450-70. PubMed ID: 19731190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial dependency of action simulation.
    ter Horst AC; van Lier R; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Aug; 212(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 21706301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To the end! Distribution of attention along a tool in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Park GD; Strom M; Reed CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 227(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 23712683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Female advantage for object location memory in peripersonal but not extrapersonal space.
    Saucier D; Lisoway A; Green S; Elias L
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Jul; 13(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 17521491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional tool actions in near and far space affect the distribution of visual attention along the tool.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):388-404. PubMed ID: 32223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripersonal versus extrapersonal visual scene information for egocentric direction and position perception.
    Nakashima R; Kumada T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1090-1099. PubMed ID: 28326888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: evidence from motor interference.
    Iachini T; Ruggiero G; Ruotolo F; Vinciguerra M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():20-7. PubMed ID: 25262059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception.
    Bach P; Peatfield NA; Tipper SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 178(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 17091293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coding of far and near space in neglect patients.
    Berti A; Smania N; Allport A
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S98-102. PubMed ID: 11373139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional representation of 3D space in endogenous attention shifts.
    Couyoumdjian A; Di Nocera F; Ferlazzo F
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):155-83. PubMed ID: 12587900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.
    Lane AR; Ball K; Smith DT; Schenk T; Ellison A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Feb; 34(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 22042759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing the world through another person's eyes: simulating selective attention via action observation.
    Frischen A; Loach D; Tipper SP
    Cognition; 2009 May; 111(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 19296931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state.
    Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2081-105. PubMed ID: 20721814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing of peripersonal and extrapersonal space using tools: evidence from visual line bisection in real and virtual environments.
    Gamberini L; Seraglia B; Priftis K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1298-304. PubMed ID: 18242649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near, yet so far: the effect of pictorial cues on spatial attention.
    Nicholls ME; Forte JD; Loetscher T; Orr CA; Yates MJ; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 21616572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Lawrence M; Eskes GA; Klein R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripersonal and extrapersonal visuospatial neglect in different frames of reference: A brain lesion-symptom mapping study.
    Ten Brink AF; Biesbroek JM; Oort Q; Visser-Meily JMA; Nijboer TCW
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jan; 356():504-515. PubMed ID: 29940260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.
    Hunley SB; Marker AM; Lourenco SF
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 28219262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.