These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22671131)

  • 1. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. History of interaction and task distribution modulate action simulation.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1240-7. PubMed ID: 23583971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Action co-representation is tuned to other humans.
    Tsai CC; Kuo WJ; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2015-24. PubMed ID: 18416679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifications of cognitive and motor tasks affect the occurrence of event-related potentials in the human cortex.
    Rektor I; Brázdil M; Nestrasil I; Bares M; Daniel P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 26(5):1371-80. PubMed ID: 17767513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus evaluation, event preparation, and motor action planning in young patients with mild spastic cerebral palsy: an event-related brain potential study.
    Hakkarainen E; Pirilä S; Kaartinen J; Meere JJ
    J Child Neurol; 2012 Apr; 27(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 21940693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G; Prinz W; Wascher E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):859-70. PubMed ID: 16768383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Apr; 1(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 25164938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Woźniak M; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():73-83. PubMed ID: 31153967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of the parietal cortex in predicting incoming actions.
    Fontana AP; Kilner JM; Rodrigues EC; Joffily M; Nighoghossian N; Vargas CD; Sirigu A
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):556-64. PubMed ID: 21839178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority for one's own stimulus in joint performance: evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Kato K; Yoshizaki K; Kimura Y
    Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 27043796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Charting the maturation of the frontal lobe: an electrophysiological strategy.
    Segalowitz SJ; Davies PL
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jun; 55(1):116-33. PubMed ID: 15134847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance.
    Loehr JD; Kourtis D; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1049-61. PubMed ID: 23489144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance monitoring of self and other in a turn-taking piano duet: A dual-EEG study.
    Huberth M; Dauer T; Nanou C; Román I; Gang N; Reid W; Wright M; Fujioka T
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):449-461. PubMed ID: 29938589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():65-79. PubMed ID: 30142512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination.
    Vesper C; van der Wel RP; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 22564161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ongoing cognitive processing of exclusionary social events: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Themanson JR; Schreiber JA; Larsen AD; Dunn KR; Ball AB; Khatcherian SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 25204663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aiming for the bull's eye: Preparing for throwing investigated with event-related brain potentials.
    Frömer R; Hafner V; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Mar; 49(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 22091907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.