193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22672129)
1. Technological innovation in spinal cord stimulation: use of a newly developed delivery device for introduction of spinal cord stimulation leads.
Logé D; De Coster O; Washburn S
Neuromodulation; 2012 Jul; 15(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 22672129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prospective evaluation of safety and success of a new method of introducing percutaneous paddle leads and complex arrays with an epidural access system.
Deer T; Bowman R; Schocket SM; Kim C; Ranson M; Amirdelfan K; Raso L
Neuromodulation; 2012; 15(1):21-9; discussion 29-30. PubMed ID: 22296616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a newly developed delivery device for percutaneous introduction of multiple lead configurations for spinal cord stimulation.
Raso LJ; Deer TR; Schocket SM; Chapman JA; Duarte LE; Justiz R; Amirdelfan K; Paicius RM; Navalgund YA; Girardi GE; Coleman NE; Verdolin M; Haider N; Rosen S; Netherton MD; Owens MC; Bennett MT; Rosenberg J; Jackson S; Nelson CL; Davis TT
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jul; 17(5):465-71; discussion 471. PubMed ID: 24612234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous implanted paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation: technical considerations and long-term follow-up.
Kinfe TM; Schu S; Quack FJ; Wille C; Vesper J
Neuromodulation; 2012 Jul; 15(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 22672364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel percutaneous technique to implant plate-type electrodes.
Logé D; De Coster O; Pollet W; Vancamp T
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):219-22. PubMed ID: 22278783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shape Memory Nitinol Based Minimally Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation Device Concept for Improved Pain Management.
Sampath SG; Telfeian AE; Sullivan R; Lu A; Srivastava V
Pain Physician; 2022 Mar; 25(2):E375-E383. PubMed ID: 35322993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs.
Babu R; Hazzard MA; Huang KT; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M; Lad SP
Neuromodulation; 2013; 16(5):418-26; discussion 426-7. PubMed ID: 23647789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Troubleshooting and problem solving: the nuances of the Epiducer.
Sastry S; Berger K
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jan; 17(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 23205853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paddle versus cylindrical leads for percutaneous implantation in spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a single-center trial.
Kinfe TM; Quack F; Wille C; Schu S; Vesper J
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 75(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 24793061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical paddle-lead placement for screening trials of spinal cord stimulation.
Pahapill PA
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):346-8; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 23815416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads.
Harland TA; Topp G; Shao K; Pilitsis JG
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 35393239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new minimally invasive technique for lead revision of perc-paddle leads.
De Coster O; Forget P; Moens M; Matic M; Choustoulakis L; Poelaert J
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Apr; 160(4):831-833. PubMed ID: 29468441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Italian experience with octopolar perc-paddle leads.
Colini Baldeschi G; De Carolis G
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 23919288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate Abdominal Pain after Placement of Thoracic Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Series.
Lee JJ; Sadrameli SS; Desai VR; Austerman RJ; Leonard DM; Dalm BD
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2018; 96(6):400-405. PubMed ID: 30605913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneously Inserted Unilateral Lead Migration Salvaged with a Paddle Electrode.
Oh BH; Kim HT; Yim KH; Park YS
Pain Pract; 2020 Jun; 20(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 31925885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical Paddle Electrode Implantation as a Rescue Therapy to Failed Percutaneous Leads in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients.
Witkam RL; Buijse ML; Arnts IJJ; Henssen DJHA; Vissers KCP; van Dongen R; Kurt E
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):745-752. PubMed ID: 35227584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Computed Tomographic Analysis of Lead Position Between Three-Column and Five-Column Paddle Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
Choi JG; Ha SW; Son BC
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():292-303. PubMed ID: 27744081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Thoracic Paddle Lead Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation Safe in an Ambulatory Surgery Center?
Monk SH; O'Brien M; Bernard JD; Kim PK
World Neurosurg; 2023 Feb; 170():e436-e440. PubMed ID: 36379362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Temporary vs. Permanent Anchored Percutaneous Lead Trial of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Adverse Events.
Simopoulos T; Sharma S; Aner M; Gill JS
Neuromodulation; 2018 Jul; 21(5):508-512. PubMed ID: 28901641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of laminectomy for the placement of a percutaneous spinal cord stimulation electrode.
Beems T; Beekwilder JP; van Dongen RT
Neuromodulation; 2011; 14(2):142-5; discussion 145. PubMed ID: 21992201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
