238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22672219)
1. Softness sensor system for simultaneously measuring the mechanical properties of superficial skin layer and whole skin.
Nakatani M; Fukuda T; Arakawa N; Kawasoe T; Omata S
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e332-8. PubMed ID: 22672219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between perceived softness of bilayered skin models and their mechanical properties measured with a dual-sensor probe.
Nakatani M; Fukuda T; Sasamoto H; Arakawa N; Otaka H; Kawasoe T; Omata S
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Feb; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 22970777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Capturing skin properties from dynamic mechanical analyses.
Sandford E; Chen Y; Hunter I; Hillebrand G; Jones L
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e339-48. PubMed ID: 22672357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin integrity testing and monitoring of in vitro tape stripping by capacitance-based sensor imaging.
Klang V; Schwarz JC; Haberfeld S; Xiao P; Wirth M; Valenta C
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e259-72. PubMed ID: 22672064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basket-weave structure in the stratum corneum is an important factor for maintaining the physiological properties of human skin as studied using reconstructed human epidermis and tape stripping of human cheek skin.
Goto H; Tada A; Ibe A; Kitajima Y
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 182(2):364-372. PubMed ID: 31077338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gravimetric and spectroscopic approaches to quantify stratum corneum removed by tape-stripping.
Mohammed D; Yang Q; Guy RH; Matts PJ; Hadgraft J; Lane ME
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2012 Sep; 82(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 22713518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evaluation of skin friction using a frictional feel analyzer.
Egawa M; Oguri M; Hirao T; Takahashi M; Miyakawa M
Skin Res Technol; 2002 Feb; 8(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 12005119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The tape stripping procedure--evaluation of some critical parameters.
Lademann J; Jacobi U; Surber C; Weigmann HJ; Fluhr JW
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2009 Jun; 72(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18775778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regional differences in adhesive tape stripping of human skin.
Tokumura F; Yoshiura Y; Homma T; Nukatsuka H
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Aug; 12(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16827692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Cutometer area parameters in evaluating age-related changes in the skin elasticity of the cheek.
Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Oyobikawa M; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Ishiko A; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e238-42. PubMed ID: 22650601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tactile sensor for detection of physical properties of human skin in vivo.
Lindahl OA; Omata S; Angquist KA
J Med Eng Technol; 1998; 22(4):147-53. PubMed ID: 9680597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new methodology for evaluating the damage to the skin barrier caused by repeated application and removal of adhesive dressings.
Waring M; Bielfeldt S; Mätzold K; Wilhelm KP
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e366-74. PubMed ID: 22694144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of transepidermal water loss and spectroscopic absorbance to quantify changes of the stratum corneum after tape stripping.
Weigmann HJ; Ulrich J; Schanzer S; Jacobi U; Schaefer H; Sterry W; Lademann J
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2005; 18(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 15908758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo study of the physiological impact of stratum corneum sampling methods.
Rosado C; Rodrigues LM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2003 Apr; 25(1-2):37-44. PubMed ID: 18494881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Explanatory models for a tactile resonance sensor system-elastic and density-related variations of prostate tissue in vitro.
Jalkanen V; Andersson BM; Bergh A; Ljungberg B; Lindahl OA
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):729-45. PubMed ID: 18560055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Stratum Corneum on the entire skin mechanical properties, as predicted by a computational skin model.
Lévêque JL; Audoly B
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22925192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of adhesive dressings on stratum corneum conductance.
Cavallini M; Gazzola R; Vaienti L
Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 22092993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo barrier challenge and initial recovery in human facial skin.
Gorcea M; Hadgraft J; Moore DJ; Lane ME
Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e375-82. PubMed ID: 22709149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
