These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22672340)
1. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review. Abboudi H; Khan MS; Aboumarzouk O; Guru KA; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K BJU Int; 2013 Feb; 111(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 22672340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot). Gavazzi A; Bahsoun AN; Van Haute W; Ahmed K; Elhage O; Jaye P; Khan MS; Dasgupta P Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Mar; 93(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 22041146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Bric JD; Lumbard DC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2169-78. PubMed ID: 26304107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training. Feifer A; Al-Ammari A; Kovac E; Delisle J; Carrier S; Anidjar M BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108(10):1652-6; discussion 1657. PubMed ID: 21470359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training--the Robotic Skills Assessment Score. Chowriappa AJ; Shi Y; Raza SJ; Ahmed K; Stegemann A; Wilding G; Kaouk J; Peabody JO; Menon M; Hassett JM; Kesavadas T; Guru KA J Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 185(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 23910887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users. Lin DW; Romanelli JR; Kuhn JN; Thompson RE; Bush RW; Seymour NE Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 18297349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools. Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. Shamim Khan M; Ahmed K; Gavazzi A; Gohil R; Thomas L; Poulsen J; Ahmed M; Jaye P; Dasgupta P BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):518-23. PubMed ID: 22928639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Bric J; Connolly M; Kastenmeier A; Goldblatt M; Gould JC Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3343-8. PubMed ID: 24946742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation-based training for prostate surgery. Khan R; Aydin A; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116(4):665-74. PubMed ID: 24588806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery. Moglia A; Ferrari V; Morelli L; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 26433570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons. Lallas CD; Davis JW; J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 22192114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills. Perrenot C; Perez M; Tran N; Jehl JP; Felblinger J; Bresler L; Hubert J Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2587-93. PubMed ID: 22476836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review. Ahmed K; Jawad M; Abboudi M; Gavazzi A; Darzi A; Athanasiou T; Vale J; Khan MS; Dasgupta P J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 21571338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum. Volpe A; Ahmed K; Dasgupta P; Ficarra V; Novara G; van der Poel H; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25454612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative analysis and guide to virtual reality robotic surgical simulators. Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P; Truong M; Perez M; Smith R Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29125206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study. Moglia A; Sinceri S; Ferrari V; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Morelli L Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):401-405. PubMed ID: 29987767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges. MacCraith E; Forde JC; Davis NF J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 30796671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool? Lee JY; Mucksavage P; Kerbl DC; Huynh VB; Etafy M; McDougall EM J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):998-1002. PubMed ID: 22264455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]