532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22673021)
1. Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-h ambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device.
Protogerou AD; Argyris A; Nasothimiou E; Vrachatis D; Papaioannou TG; Tzamouranis D; Blacher J; Safar ME; Sfikakis P; Stergiou GS
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 25(8):876-82. PubMed ID: 22673021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive 24 hour ambulatory monitoring of aortic wave reflection and arterial stiffness by a novel oscillometric device: the first feasibility and reproducibility study.
Papaioannou TG; Argyris A; Protogerou AD; Vrachatis D; Nasothimiou EG; Sfikakis PP; Stergiou GS; Stefanadis CI
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 169(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24063914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left-ventricular hypertrophy is associated better with 24-h aortic pressure than 24-h brachial pressure in hypertensive patients: the SAFAR study.
Protogerou AD; Argyris AA; Papaioannou TG; Kollias GE; Konstantonis GD; Nasothimiou E; Achimastos A; Blacher J; Safar ME; Sfikakis PP
J Hypertens; 2014 Sep; 32(9):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24999798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.
Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Nov; 25(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 22874891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a brachial cuff and suprasystolic waveform algorithm method to noninvasively derive central blood pressure.
Costello BT; Schultz MG; Black JA; Sharman JE
Am J Hypertens; 2015 Apr; 28(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 25194156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of central systolic blood pressure by pulse volume plethysmography with a noninvasive blood pressure monitor.
Sung SH; Cheng HM; Chuang SY; Shih YT; Wang KL; Chen YH; Lin SJ; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2012 May; 25(5):542-8. PubMed ID: 22278210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric method for estimating central systolic pressure in hemodialysis patients.
Sarafidis PA; Georgianos PI; Karpetas A; Bikos A; Korelidou L; Tersi M; Divanis D; Tzanis G; Mavromatidis K; Liakopoulos V; Zebekakis PE; Lasaridis A; Protogerou AD
Am J Nephrol; 2014; 40(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 25322847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Comparison of Agreement between Oscillometric and Finger-Cuff Methods.
Alfano G; Fontana F; Cappelli G
Nephron; 2017; 136(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 28468005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preliminary evaluation of the mean arterial pressure as measured by cuff oscillometry.
Smulyan H; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Feb; 21(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 18174881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification.
Nakagomi A; Okada S; Shoji T; Kobayashi Y
Hypertens Res; 2017 Mar; 40(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27761001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
