These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22673417)

  • 1. Evaluation of threshold color differences using printed samples.
    Huang M; Liu H; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Jun; 29(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 22673417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromaticity-discrimination thresholds with aperture and object colors: experimental results and predictions of some recent color-difference formulas.
    Melgosa M; Perez MM; Hita E
    Appl Opt; 1996 Jan; 35(1):176-87. PubMed ID: 21068996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of select color-difference formulas in the blue region.
    Shamey R; Cao R; Tomasino T; Zaidy SS; Iqbal K; Lin J; Lee SG
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1328-36. PubMed ID: 24977373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color difference evaluation for wide-color-gamut displays.
    Zhao B; Xu Q; Luo MR
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2020 Aug; 37(8):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32749260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual sensitivity to color errors in images of natural scenes.
    Aldaba MA; Linhares JM; Pinto PD; Nascimento SM; Amano K; Foster DH
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):555-9. PubMed ID: 16961995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applicability of CIELAB/CIEDE2000 formula in visual color assessments of metal ceramic restorations.
    Xu BT; Zhang B; Kang Y; Wang YN; Li Q
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e3-9. PubMed ID: 22525017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
    Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing Parametric Factors in CIELAB and CIEDE2000 Color-Difference Formulas for 3D-Printed Spherical Objects.
    He R; Xiao K; Pointer M; Melgosa M; Bressler Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric effects on the evaluation of threshold chromaticity differences using red printed samples.
    Brusola F; Tortajada I; Jordá B; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):510-517. PubMed ID: 31044969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of CIELAB DeltaE(*) and CIEDE2000 color-differences after polymerization and thermocycling of resin composites.
    Lee YK
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):678-82. PubMed ID: 15978278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring color differences in automotive samples with lightness flop: a test of the AUDI2000 color-difference formula.
    Melgosa M; Martínez-García J; Gómez-Robledo L; Perales E; Martínez-Verdú FM; Dauser T
    Opt Express; 2014 Feb; 22(3):3458-67. PubMed ID: 24663636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color discrimination ellipses of trichromats measured with transient and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Gomes BD; Souza GS; Lima MG; Rodrigues AR; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 18598404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalization of color-difference formulas for any illuminant and any observer by assuming perfect color constancy in a color-vision model based on the OSA-UCS system.
    Oleari C; Melgosa M; Huertas R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Nov; 28(11):2226-34. PubMed ID: 22048289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A color difference metric based on the chromaticity discrimination ellipses.
    Wen S
    Opt Express; 2012 Nov; 20(24):26441-7. PubMed ID: 23187498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uniformity of some recent color metrics tested with an accurate color-difference tolerance dataset.
    Melgosa M; Quesada JJ; Hita E
    Appl Opt; 1994 Dec; 33(34):8069-77. PubMed ID: 20963027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of naïve and expert subjects in the assessment of small color differences.
    Shamey R; Cárdenas LM; Hinks D; Woodard R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Jun; 27(6):1482-9. PubMed ID: 20508719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the amount of UV component in daylight simulator on the color of dental composite resins.
    Lu H; Lee YK; Villalta P; Powers JM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 17098494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metameric effect between resin composite and dentin.
    Lee YK; Powers JM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 16084581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.