These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22673642)

  • 21. Improvements in sound attenuation performance with earplugs following checklist-based self-practice.
    Takahashi K; Kawaniai S; Inoue J; Horie S
    J UOEH; 2011 Dec; 33(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 22259832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A survey of the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of workers exposed to noise in manufacturing factories].
    Kabe I; Koga Y; Kochi T; Miyauchi H; Minozoe A; Kuwata D; Tsustumi I; Nakagawa M; Tanaka S
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 57(6):306-13. PubMed ID: 26346131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics of noise exposure during solitary trumpet playing: immediate impact on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and long-term implications for hearing.
    Poissant SF; Freyman RL; MacDonald AJ; Nunes HA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 22531575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Do hearing threshold levels in workers of the furniture industry reflect their exposure to noise?].
    Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Czaja N; Bortkiewicz A
    Med Pr; 2016; 67(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 27364108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of exposure to voices and noise via earphones in manufacturing industry workers in Japan.
    Nakao T; Kakei M; Araki I; Tsutsui T; Satoh N; Inoue J; Horie S
    J Occup Health; 2014; 56(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24953090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of earplugs in high-intensity impulse noise.
    Dancer A; Grateau P; Cabanis A; Barnabé G; Cagnin G; Vaillant T; Lafont D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1677-89. PubMed ID: 1564203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Prevalence and characterization of hearing loss in workers exposed to industrial noise of the turbogenerated electric plant of a petrochemical industry].
    Montiel-López M; Corzo-Alvarez G; Chacín-Almarza B; Rojas-González L; Quevedo A; Rendiles H
    Invest Clin; 2006 Jun; 47(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 16886774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE - a case report.
    Gomes RF; Samelli AG; Bistafa SR
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Dec; 24(4):577-581. PubMed ID: 28776454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.