These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22673854)

  • 1. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
    Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
    Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
    J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes.
    Meyenberg A; Iliev ME; Eschmann R; Frueh BE
    Cornea; 2008 Apr; 27(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 18362658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.
    Ozbek Z; Cohen EJ; Hammersmith KM; Rapuano CJ
    Cornea; 2006 Sep; 25(8):890-4. PubMed ID: 17102662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of corneal thickness changes during active uveitis on Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Heinz C; Taneri S; Roesel M; Heiligenhaus A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2012; 48(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22354174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer performance in a developing world setting: intraocular pressure measurement acquisition and precision.
    Cheng J; Salam T; Russell PJ; Heath DG; Kotecha A
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):736-9. PubMed ID: 23708422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Kandarakis A; Soumplis V; Pitsas C; Kandarakis S; Halikias J; Karagiannis D
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 45(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 20847755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model.
    Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
    Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery.
    Heinrich MA; Eppig T; Langenbucher A; Walter S; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 22365580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.