These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22673974)

  • 1. 30th Liverpool course—is this a record? Comprehensive review on mobile phone technologies finds no solid evidence of health effects.
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):193. PubMed ID: 22673974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply to '30th Liverpool course-is this a record?'.
    Moody J
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):361. PubMed ID: 22948419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [SAR values of mobile phones. Safety evaluation and risk perception].
    Wiedemann PM; Schütz H; Sachse K; Jungermann H
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Feb; 49(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 16391899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electromagnetic safety of children using wireless phones: a literature review.
    Martens L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S133-7. PubMed ID: 16059915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A geographical model of radio-frequency power density around mobile phone masts.
    Briggs D; Beale L; Bennett J; Toledano MB; de Hoogh K
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 426():233-43. PubMed ID: 22521103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Point/counterpoint. There is currently enough evidence and technology available to warrant taking immediate steps to reduce exposure of consumers to cell-phone-related electromagnetic radiation.
    Khurana VG; Moulder JE; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5203-6. PubMed ID: 19175079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The selection of parameter values in studies of environmental radiological impacts.
    Thorne MC
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Jun; 33(2):N1-7. PubMed ID: 23481090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists?
    Schauer DA; Linton OW
    Health Phys; 2009 Jul; 97(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19509507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criteria for safe working with iodine-125.
    Linsley GS
    Radiography; 1977 Apr; 43(508):91-3. PubMed ID: 860017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Workshop on networking radiation sciences in health, safety and the environment.
    Lemon JA; Boreham DR
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 Jan; 80(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 14761853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The selection of parameter values in studies of environmental radiological impacts.
    Avila R; Beresford N; Brown J; Hosseini A
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):260-3. PubMed ID: 24749153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply to 'The selection of parameter values in studies of environmental radiological impacts'.
    Thorne MC
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):263-5. PubMed ID: 24749154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NCRP Report Number 160: its significance to medical imaging.
    Mahesh M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):890-2. PubMed ID: 19945048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation protection: where are we after Fukushima?
    Coates R
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):E13-6. PubMed ID: 25431996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 30th Liverpool course-is this a record? Comprehensive review on mobile phone technologies finds no solid evidence of health effects.
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):193-195. PubMed ID: 22678092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do radiation doses below 1 cGy increase cancer risks?
    Brenner DJ; Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2005 Jun; 163(6):692-3. PubMed ID: 16044492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 2: low-level exposures and cancer risk.
    Strzelczyk JJ; Damilakis J; Marx MV; Macura KJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jan; 4(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17412222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electromagnetic fields and epidemiology: an overview inspired by the fourth course at the International School of Bioelectromagnetics.
    Schüz J; Lagorio S; Bersani F
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct; 30(7):511-24. PubMed ID: 19479936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on Bithell, J. F., Keegan, T. J., Kroll, M. E., Murphy, M. F. G. and Vincent, T. J., Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 132(2), 191-197 (2008).
    Körblein A; Fairlie I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):87-8; author reply 89-91. PubMed ID: 19841011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile phone use and exposures in children.
    Schüz J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S45-50. PubMed ID: 16142783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.