315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22674220)
1. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of a tertiary Gleason pattern 4 or 5 on clinical failure and mortality after radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer.
Servoll E; Saeter T; Vlatkovic L; Lund T; Nesland J; Waaler G; Axcrona K; Beisland HO
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1489-94. PubMed ID: 21933333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) and prostate cancer significance.
van Poppel H; Haese A; Graefen M; de la Taille A; Irani J; de Reijke T; Remzi M; Marberger M
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 21883822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a difference in outcome after radical prostatectomy between patients with biopsy Gleason sums 4, 5, and 6? Results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Amling CL; Terris MK; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Elashoff D; Kane CJ;
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2003; 6(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 12970733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
