76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22675943)
1. [Research progress of the objective voice assessment].
Zhou Z; Liu M; Ge P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 26(6):285-8. PubMed ID: 22675943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing efficacy of voice treatments: a guideline.
Dejonckere PH;
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 11387654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).
Dejonckere PH; Bradley P; Clemente P; Cornut G; Crevier-Buchman L; Friedrich G; Van De Heyning P; Remacle M; Woisard V;
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Feb; 258(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 11307610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect.
DeJonckere PH; Crevier-Buchman L; Marie JP; Moerman M; Remacle M; Woisard V;
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2003; 124(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 15144022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of a multidimensional basic protocol for assessing functional results of voice therapy. A preliminary study.
Dejonckere PH
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):311-3. PubMed ID: 11387655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians.
Lechien JR; Geneid A; Bohlender JE; Cantarella G; Avellaneda JC; Desuter G; Sjogren EV; Finck C; Hans S; Hess M; Oguz H; Remacle MJ; Schneider-Stickler B; Tedla M; Schindler A; Vilaseca I; Zabrodsky M; Dikkers FG; Crevier-Buchman L
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5459-5473. PubMed ID: 37707614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Subjective acoustic analysis of dysphonia caused by tumor using the RBH (roughness, breathiness, hoarseness) scale].
Mitrović S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2003; 131(1-2):40-2. PubMed ID: 14608861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Subjective and objective assessment of voice quality after surgical treatment of overgrowth changes in vocal folds].
Ratajczak J; Wojdas A; Rapiejko P; Jurkiewicz D
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Sep; 19(111):327-30. PubMed ID: 16358858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What can vortices tell us about vocal fold vibration and voice production.
Khosla S; Murugappan S; Gutmark E
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 16(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 18475068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: evaluating vocal function.
Cohen W; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 22149459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of dysphonia due to benign vocal fold lesions by acoustic and aerodynamic indices: a multivariate analysis.
Cantarella G; Baracca G; Pignataro L; Forti S
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Apr; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20950128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of voice quality: Current state-of-the-art.
Barsties B; De Bodt M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 25440411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Relationship between voice acoustic parameters and vocal quality].
Huang Z; Wan P
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 22(6):251-5. PubMed ID: 18533559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The voice evaluation protocol of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) -- first results of a multicenter study].
Friedrich G; Dejonckere PH
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Oct; 84(10):744-52. PubMed ID: 16231242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aerodynamic analysis of male-to-female transgender voice.
Gorham-Rowan M; Morris R
J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):251-62. PubMed ID: 16112545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Subjective and objective voice assessment following partial resection of the larynx].
Ptok M; de Maddalena H
Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jul; 69(7):356-9. PubMed ID: 2244949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of voice acoustic analysis in assessment of occupational voice pathologies in teachers.
Niebudek-Bogusz E; Fiszer M; Kotylo P; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 16966152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder.
Cohen W; Wardrop A; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 22149600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deviant vocal fold vibration as observed during videokymography: the effect on voice quality.
Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Mahieu HF
J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 11575628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
