251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22676508)
1. The evolution of prenatal screening and diagnosis and its impact on an unselected population over an 18-year period.
Boyd PA; Rounding C; Chamberlain P; Wellesley D; Kurinczuk JJ
BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1131-40. PubMed ID: 22676508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France.
Julian-Reynier C; Philip N; Scheiner C; Aurran Y; Chabal F; Maron A; Gombert A; Aymé S
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Jun; 48(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 8051530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.
Colvin J; Bower C; Dickinson JE; Sokol J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):e356-63. PubMed ID: 16140678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK.
Boyd PA; Chamberlain P; Hicks NR
Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9140):1577-81. PubMed ID: 9843102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series.
Anderson N; Boswell O; Duff G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7676997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of prenatal screening and diagnosis on the epidemiology of structural congenital anomalies.
Chi LH; Stone DH; Gilmour WH
J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 7497158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe.
Garne E; Loane M; Dolk H; De Vigan C; Scarano G; Tucker D; Stoll C; Gener B; Pierini A; Nelen V; Rösch C; Gillerot Y; Feijoo M; Tincheva R; Queisser-Luft A; Addor MC; Mosquera C; Gatt M; Barisic I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15619321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study.
Boyd PA; Tondi F; Hicks NR; Chamberlain PF
BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7432):137. PubMed ID: 14662522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of routine ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of structural anomalies of the fetus.
Ashe RG; Dornan JC; Patterson CC; Thompson W
Ir Med J; 1996; 89(5):180-2. PubMed ID: 8936842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False positives in the prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal structural anomalies.
Martinez-Zamora MA; Borrell A; Borobio V; Gonce A; Perez M; Botet F; Nadal A; Albert A; Puerto B; Fortuny A
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jan; 27(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17154189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience.
Carrera JM; Torrents M; Mortera C; Cusí V; Muñoz A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 5(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 7788491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Epidemiological surveillance and prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies in the Parisian population, 1981-2007].
Lelong N; Thieulin AC; Vodovar V; Goffinet F; Khoshnood B
Arch Pediatr; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1030-8. PubMed ID: 22939647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwives; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies.
Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Cnattingius S; Eriksson L; Norsted T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Feb; 78(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10023870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.
Nakling J; Backe B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 16232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Terminated pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies--a part of register of congenital anomalies].
Kovacheva K; Simeonova M; Stoĭkov S; Slavov N; Pandurski F; Bŭrzashki I; Popov I; Markova S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(6):10-5. PubMed ID: 17168477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.
Karim JN; Roberts NW; Salomon LJ; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):429-441. PubMed ID: 27546497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: are we ready to screen for fetal anomalies with first trimester ultrasound?
Kontopoulos E; Odibo A; Wilson RD
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jan; 33(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 23296714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Empty renal fossa--a prenatal diagnostic dilemma].
Markov D; Atanassova D; Pavlova E; Markov P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 21268397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984-2007.
Boyle B; McConkey R; Garne E; Loane M; Addor MC; Bakker MK; Boyd PA; Gatt M; Greenlees R; Haeusler M; Klungsøyr K; Latos-Bielenska A; Lelong N; McDonnell R; Métneki J; Mullaney C; Nelen V; O'Mahony M; Pierini A; Rankin J; Rissmann A; Tucker D; Wellesley D; Dolk H
BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 23384325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in resource use and effectiveness of ultrasound detection of fetal structural anomalies in France: a multiple registry-based study.
Ferrier C; Dhombres F; Khoshnood B; Randrianaivo H; Perthus I; Guilbaut L; Durand-Zaleski I; Jouannic JM
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e025482. PubMed ID: 30772861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
