1082 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22677401)
1. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.
Ojala JJ; Kapanen MK; Hyödynmaa SJ; Wigren TK; Pitkänen MA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4662. PubMed ID: 24710454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic IMRT treatments of sinus region tumors: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with treatment planning system calculations and ion chamber measurements.
Court LE; Jahnke L; Chin D; Song J; Cormack R; Zygmanski P; Tishler RB; Chin L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 5(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 16981791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulations to replace film dosimetry in IMRT verification.
Goetzfried T; Rickhey M; Treutwein M; Koelbl O; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011; 21(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20888202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
