These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22677882)

  • 1. Misperceiving space following shifts of attention: determining the locus of the attentional repulsion effect.
    DiGiacomo A; Pratt J
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 64():35-41. PubMed ID: 22677882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A monocular, unconscious form of visual attention.
    Self MW; Roelfsema PR
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):17.1-23. PubMed ID: 20465336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion repulsion is monocular.
    Grunewald A
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):959-62. PubMed ID: 15031088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interocular transfer of spatial adaptation is weak at low spatial frequencies.
    Baker DH; Meese TS
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():81-7. PubMed ID: 22588117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of binocular and monocular distractors on saccades in participants with normal binocular vision.
    Griffiths H; Whittle J; Buckley D
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):72-81. PubMed ID: 16246393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.
    Zackon DH; Casson EJ; Stelmach L; Faubert J; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Near complete interocular transfer of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Vision Res; 2018 Sep; 150():24-28. PubMed ID: 30016642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness.
    Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voluntary attention modulates processing of eye-specific visual information.
    Zhang P; Jiang Y; He S
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Mar; 23(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 22301519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries.
    van Boxtel JJ; Knapen T; Erkelens CJ; van Ee R
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):13.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binocular capture: the effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target.
    Raghunandan A
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2369-77. PubMed ID: 21982870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatio-temporal interpolation is accomplished by binocular form and motion mechanisms.
    Kandil FI; Lappe M
    PLoS One; 2007 Feb; 2(2):e264. PubMed ID: 17327923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.
    Filali-Sadouk N; Castet E; Olivier E; Zenon A
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):21.1-13. PubMed ID: 20465340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Kosovicheva AA; Fortenbaugh FC; Robertson LC
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):33. PubMed ID: 21047765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of intensity and positional predictability of a visual stimulus on simple reaction time.
    Carreiro LR; Haddad H; Baldo MV
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 20974219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Path dissociation of visual signals entering the cortex: disparity, contour orientation and position.
    Westheimer G
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(9):1058-63. PubMed ID: 21356227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Specifics of interactions of mono- and binocular mechanisms of spatial perception in cecutient children].
    Vasil'eva NN
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2011; 127(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 21539098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.