These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22678214)

  • 21. DSC: software tool for simulation-based design of control strategies applied to wastewater treatment plants.
    Ruano MV; Ribes J; Seco A; Ferrer J
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 21330730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of mathematical tools to improve the design and operation of activated sludge plants. Case study: the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao. Part I: Optimum design.
    Rivas A; Ayesa E; Galarza A; Salterain A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):157-65. PubMed ID: 11385842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a knowledge-based decision support system for identifying adequate wastewater treatment for small communities.
    Comas J; Alemany J; Poch M; Torrens A; Salgot M; Bou J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):393-400. PubMed ID: 14753561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Upgrading of wastewater treatment plants for nutrient removal under optimal use of existing structures.
    Winkler S; Gasser M; Schättle W; Kremmel D; Kletzmayr P; Matsché N
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1437-43. PubMed ID: 18496010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach.
    Kalbar PP; Karmakar S; Asolekar SR
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():158-69. PubMed ID: 23023038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Parameter optimisation of real-time control strategies for urban wastewater systems.
    Schütze M; Butler D; Beck MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):139-46. PubMed ID: 11385840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benchmarking--an approach to efficiency enhancement in planning, construction and operation of wastewater treatment plants.
    Stemplewski J; Schulz A; Schön J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):111-7. PubMed ID: 11547973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative analysis of different approaches for integrated WWTP modelling.
    Grau P; Copp J; Vanrolleghem PA; Takács I; Ayesa E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 19151496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simulation of wastewater treatment plant within integrated urban wastewater models.
    Heusch S; Kamradt B; Ostrowski M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2645-52. PubMed ID: 20453339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulation program for wastewater coagulation.
    Ratnaweera H; Lei L; Lindholm O
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):27-33. PubMed ID: 12361020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Data evaluation of full-scale wastewater treatment plants by mass balance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(18):4645-55. PubMed ID: 18786694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy.
    Nopens I; Benedetti L; Jeppsson U; Pons MN; Alex J; Copp JB; Gernaey KV; Rosen C; Steyer JP; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 21045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A methodology to evaluate water and wastewater treatment plant reliability.
    Eisenberg D; Soller J; Sakaji R; Olivieri A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):91-9. PubMed ID: 11436809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrated assessment of a new Waste-to-Energy facility in Central Greece in the context of regional perspectives.
    Perkoulidis G; Papageorgiou A; Karagiannidis A; Kalogirou S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1395-406. PubMed ID: 20061131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative analysis of methods to represent uncertainty in estimating the cost of constructing wastewater treatment plants.
    Chen HW; Chang NB
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 65(4):383-409. PubMed ID: 12369402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advanced data management for optimising the operation of a full-scale WWTP.
    Beltrán S; Maiza M; de la Sota A; Villanueva JM; Ayesa E
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):314-20. PubMed ID: 22699335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of primary sedimentation on full-scale WWTP nutrient removal performance.
    Puig S; van Loosdrecht MC; Flameling AG; Colprim J; Meijer SC
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3375-84. PubMed ID: 20430413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2894-906. PubMed ID: 19447462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Algal wastewater treatment systems for seasonal climates: application of a simple modelling approach to generate local and regional design guidelines.
    Heaven S; Salter AM; Clarke D; Pak LN
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2307-23. PubMed ID: 22365374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.