104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2268127)
1. [Uterine cervix cancers: staging by magnetic resonance imaging].
Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Di Stefano-Louineau D; Gaubert JY; Delannoy L; Delpero JR; Blanc B; Kasbarian M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 2268127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].
Einspieler R; Ebner F; Hofmann HM; Ranner G; Tamussino K; Justich E
Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 2154013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?
Rockall AG; Ghosh S; Alexander-Sefre F; Babar S; Younis MT; Naz S; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16310245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
Matsubara M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (a pilot study).
Soeters RP; Beningfield SJ; Dehaeck K; Levin W; Bloch B
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2015918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.
Narayan K; McKenzie A; Fisher R; Susil B; Jobling T; Bernshaw D
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e163-8. PubMed ID: 14528092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.
Hricak H; Lacey CG; Sandles LG; Chang YC; Winkler ML; Stern JL
Radiology; 1988 Mar; 166(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 3340756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer?
Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 37(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 17556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma: a pictorial review.
Smith GE; Gormly K
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 19032387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extension in uterine cervical cancer cases with special attention to imaging planes].
Goto M; Okamura S; Ueki M; Sugimoto O
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 42(12):1627-33. PubMed ID: 2277202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor volume and uterine body invasion assessed by MRI for prediction of outcome in cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Kim H; Kim W; Lee M; Song E; Loh JJ
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 37(11):858-66. PubMed ID: 18037686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
