These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22681614)

  • 1. Early public impressions of terrestrial carbon capture and storage in a coal-intensive state.
    Carley SR; Krause RM; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7086-93. PubMed ID: 22681614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Not in (or under) my backyard": Geographic proximity and public acceptance of carbon capture and storage facilities.
    Krause RM; Carley SR; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Risk Anal; 2014 Mar; 34(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 24117789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Front page or "buried" beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage.
    Boyd AD; Paveglio TB
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 May; 23(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 23825250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term energy and climate implications of carbon capture and storage deployment strategies in the US coal-fired electricity fleet.
    Sathre R; Masanet E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9768-76. PubMed ID: 22857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influencing attitudes toward carbon capture and sequestration: a social marketing approach.
    Wong-Parodi G; Dowlatabadi H; McDaniels T; Ray I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(16):6743-51. PubMed ID: 21728279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stakeholder views on financing carbon capture and storage demonstration projects in China.
    Reiner D; Liang X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 22191735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS.
    Braun C
    Risk Anal; 2017 Dec; 37(12):2264-2275. PubMed ID: 28334453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies.
    Fleishman LA; De Bruin WB; Morgan MG
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1399-410. PubMed ID: 20561264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of initial affective impressions in responses to educational communications: the case of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).
    Bruine de Bruin W; Wong-Parodi G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 24708355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Popularization of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology in Society: Principles and Methods.
    Cherepovitsyn A; Chvileva T; Fedoseev S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33198172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep CCS: Moving Beyond 90% Carbon Dioxide Capture.
    Dods MN; Kim EJ; Long JR; Weston SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jul; 55(13):8524-8534. PubMed ID: 34157836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS.
    Wallquist L; Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(17):6557-62. PubMed ID: 20681511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.