346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22681653)
1. Positive effects of robotic exoskeleton training of upper limb reaching movements after stroke.
Frisoli A; Procopio C; Chisari C; Creatini I; Bonfiglio L; Bergamasco M; Rossi B; Carboncini MC
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():36. PubMed ID: 22681653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.
Pila O; Duret C; Laborne FX; Gracies JM; Bayle N; Hutin E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 14(1):105. PubMed ID: 29029633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients.
Otaka E; Otaka Y; Kasuga S; Nishimoto A; Yamazaki K; Kawakami M; Ushiba J; Liu M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 12():66. PubMed ID: 26265327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of an assist-as-needed equipped Tenodesis-Induced-Grip Exoskeleton Robot (TIGER) on upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.
Hsu HY; Koh CL; Yang KC; Lin YC; Hsu CH; Su FC; Kuo LC
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 38173006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Carpinella I; Lencioni T; Bowman T; Bertoni R; Turolla A; Ferrarin M; Jonsdottir J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 32000790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES.
Milot MH; Spencer SJ; Chan V; Allington JP; Klein J; Chou C; Bobrow JE; Cramer SC; Reinkensmeyer DJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 24354476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How could robotic training and botolinum toxin be combined in chronic post stroke upper limb spasticity? A pilot study.
Pennati GV; Da Re C; Messineo I; Bonaiuti D
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 25358636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized clinical control study on the efficacy of three-dimensional upper limb robotic exoskeleton training in chronic stroke.
Frisoli A; Barsotti M; Sotgiu E; Lamola G; Procopio C; Chisari C
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 35120546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System.
Adomavičienė A; Daunoravičienė K; Kubilius R; Varžaitytė L; Raistenskis J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30970655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of a Soft Robotic Hand for Hand Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Survivors.
Shi XQ; Heung HL; Tang ZQ; Li Z; Tong KY
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Jul; 30(7):105812. PubMed ID: 33895427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Wrist Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mazzoleni S; Tran VD; Dario P; Posteraro F
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Jul; 27(7):1458-1466. PubMed ID: 31170077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Robotic Path Assistance and Weight Support in Facilitating 3D Movements in Individuals With Poststroke Hemiparesis.
Raghavan P; Bilaloglu S; Ali SZ; Jin X; Aluru V; Buckley MC; Tang A; Yousefi A; Stone J; Agrawal SK; Lu Y
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2020 Feb; 34(2):134-147. PubMed ID: 31959040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reaching exercise for chronic paretic upper extremity after stroke using a novel rehabilitation robot with arm-weight support and concomitant electrical stimulation and vibration: before-and-after feasibility trial.
Amano Y; Noma T; Etoh S; Miyata R; Kawamura K; Shimodozono M
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 May; 19(1):28. PubMed ID: 32375788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and robot hybrid system for multi-joint coordinated upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.
Rong W; Li W; Pang M; Hu J; Wei X; Yang B; Wai H; Zheng X; Hu X
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 28446181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effects of the Arm Light Exoskeleton on movement execution and muscle activities: a pilot study on healthy subjects.
Pirondini E; Coscia M; Marcheschi S; Roas G; Salsedo F; Frisoli A; Bergamasco M; Micera S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 26801620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
