These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22681783)

  • 21. Incorporating parameter uncertainty into Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA).
    Donald M; Mengersen K; Toze S; Sidhu JP; Cook A
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 21301111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity analysis and estimation of extreme tail behavior in two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation.
    Roelofs VJ; Kennedy MC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Oct; 31(10):1597-609. PubMed ID: 21418084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of QT interval prolongation through model-averaging.
    Bonate PL
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2017 Aug; 44(4):335-349. PubMed ID: 28421417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.
    Simon SL; Hoffman FO; Hofer E
    Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 183(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 25496314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative estimation of uncertainty in human risk analysis.
    Sassi G; Vernai AM; Ruggeri B
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 145(1-2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17175099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Model averaging techniques for quantifying conceptual model uncertainty.
    Singh A; Mishra S; Ruskauff G
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 19878329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
    van Dijk JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
    Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of interval and Monte Carlo simulation for the prediction of postprandial glucose under uncertainty in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Calm R; García-Jaramillo M; Bondia J; Sainz MA; Vehí J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Dec; 104(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 20870308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncertainties analysis for the plutonium dosimetry model, doses-2005, using Mayak bioassay data.
    Bess JD; Krahenbuhl MP; Miller SC; Slaughter DM; Khokhryakov VV; Khokhryakov VF; Suslova KG; Vostrotin VV
    Health Phys; 2007 Sep; 93(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 17693771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared.
    Nixon RM; Wonderling D; Grieve RD
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):316-33. PubMed ID: 19378353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Model uncertainty and risk estimation for experimental studies of quantal responses.
    Bailer AJ; Noble RB; Wheeler MW
    Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 15876205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater.
    Chen YC; Ma HW
    Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 16213568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of human health risks from animal antimicrobial use in a dynamic model of emerging resistance.
    Cox LA; Popken DA
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1153-64. PubMed ID: 15563285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Monte Carlo method to evaluate the impact of positioning errors on detector response and quality correction factors in nonstandard beams.
    Bouchard H; Seuntjens J; Kawrakow I
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2617-34. PubMed ID: 21454927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Model averaging methods for the evaluation of dose-response model uncertainty when assessing the suitability of studies for estimating risk.
    Mendez W; Shao K; Lee JS; Cote I; Druwe IL; Davis A; Gift JS
    Environ Int; 2020 Oct; 143():105857. PubMed ID: 32615345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A method for calculating Bayesian uncertainties on internal doses resulting from complex occupational exposures.
    Puncher M; Birchall A; Bull RK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 22355169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
    Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
    Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of microbial dose-response models fitted to human data.
    Moon H; Chen JJ; Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Oct; 40(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 15450720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.