BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22682377)

  • 1. Assessment of respondent acceptability for preference measures in stuttering.
    Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
    J Commun Disord; 2012; 45(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 22682377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of respondent acceptability of preference measures: discriminatory power of graphic positioning scale versus traditional scaling measures.
    Franic DM; Pathak DS
    Value Health; 2003; 6(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 12859590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A welfare economic approach to measure outcomes in stuttering: comparing willingness to pay and quality adjusted life years.
    Franic DM; Bothe AK; Bramlett RE
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Dec; 37(4):300-13. PubMed ID: 23218213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering.
    Bramlett RE; Bothe AK; Franic DM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 16671851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
    Lin MR; Hwang HF; Chung KP; Huang C; Chen CY
    Phys Ther; 2006 Mar; 86(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 16506870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation.
    Kontodimopoulos N; Niakas D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jan; 6():3. PubMed ID: 16412242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.
    Khanna D; Ahmed M; Furst DE; Ginsburg SS; Park GS; Hornung R; Tsevat J
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Feb; 57(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17266070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability of computerized visual analog scale, time trade-off and standard gamble rating methods in patients and the public.
    Lenert LA; Sturley AE
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2001; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 11825211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1536-43. PubMed ID: 7473480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating preference scores in conventional and home nocturnal hemodialysis patients.
    McFarlane PA; Pierratos A; Bayoumi AM; Redelmeier DA
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2007 May; 2(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 17699454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between preference-based health-related quality of life and asthma severity.
    Moy ML; Fuhlbrigge AL; Blumenschein K; Chapman RH; Zillich AJ; Kuntz KM; Paltiel AD; Kitch BT; Weiss ST; Neumann PJ
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 15049396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing health utilities in schizophrenia. A feasibility study.
    Voruganti LN; Awad AG; Oyewumi LK; Cortese L; Zirul S; Dhawan R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Mar; 17(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 10947302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A-D).
    Koedoot C; Versteegh M; Yaruss JS
    J Fluency Disord; 2011 Sep; 36(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 22118398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter.
    Craig A; Blumgart E; Tran Y
    J Fluency Disord; 2009 Jun; 34(2):61-71. PubMed ID: 19686883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should "standard gamble" and "'time trade off" utility measurement be used more in mental health research?
    Flood C
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2010 Jun; 13(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 20919593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma.
    Blumenschein K; Johannesson M
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Feb; 80(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 9494453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do utility values and willingness to pay suitably reflect health outcome in hip and knee osteoarthritis? A comparative analysis with the WOMAC Index.
    Ethgen O; Tancredi A; Lejeune E; Kvasz A; Zegels B; Reginster JY
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2452-9. PubMed ID: 14677192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.