These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22682558)
1. Cyclic loading of fractured cadaveric femurs after elastomer femoroplasty: an in vitro biomechanical study. van der Steenhoven TJ; Schaasberg W; de Vries AC; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Oct; 27(8):819-23. PubMed ID: 22682558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elastomer femoroplasty prevents hip fracture displacement In vitro biomechanical study comparing two minimal invasive femoroplasty techniques. van der Steenhoven TJ; Schaasberg W; de Vries AC; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 21255888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of osteosynthesis of fractured cadaveric hips following preventive elastomer femoroplasty. Schaasberg W; van der Steenhoven TJ; van de Velde SK; Nelissen RG; Valstar ER Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):742-6. PubMed ID: 25001328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Augmentation with silicone stabilizes proximal femur fractures: an in vitro biomechanical study. van der Steenhoven TJ; Schaasberg W; de Vries AC; Valstar ER; Nelissen RG Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19168267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femoroplasty-augmentation of mechanical properties in the osteoporotic proximal femur: a biomechanical investigation of PMMA reinforcement in cadaver bones. Heini PF; Franz T; Fankhauser C; Gasser B; Ganz R Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jun; 19(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 15182986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. Rupprecht M; Grossterlinden L; Ruecker AH; de Oliveira AN; Sellenschloh K; Nüchtern J; Püschel K; Morlock M; Rueger JM; Lehmann W J Trauma; 2011 Sep; 71(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 21768904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive screw plates for surgery of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparative study. Ropars M; Mitton D; Skalli W Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18579266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study. Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate. Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs. Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur. Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator for bone graft harvest: a mechanical comparison of three starting points in cadaveric femurs. Finnan RP; Prayson MJ; Goswami T; Miller D J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jan; 24(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 20035176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a short glass fibre-reinforced tube as a model for cat femur for biomechanical testing of orthopaedic implants. Gibson TW; Moens NM; Runciman RJ; Holmberg DL Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 18536844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Wolf RS; Zheng N; Weichel D Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 15689867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone. Demos HA; Briones MS; White PH; Hogan KA; Barfield WR J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 22014657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential. Beckmann J; Ferguson SJ; Gebauer M; Luering C; Gasser B; Heini P Med Eng Phys; 2007 Sep; 29(7):755-64. PubMed ID: 17023189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanical properties of the feline femur. Gibson TW; Moens NM; Runciman RJ; Holmberg DL; Monteith GM Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 18704236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]