119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22682581)
1. Haematospermia as a presenting symptom: outcomes of investigation in 300 men.
Ng YH; Seeley JP; Smith G
Surgeon; 2013 Feb; 11(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 22682581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A single episode of haematospermia can be safely managed in the community.
Wilson C; Boyd K; Mohammed A; Little B
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Sep; 64(10):1436-9. PubMed ID: 20716149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.
Miele ME
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15625982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of the digital rectal examination as diagnostic test for prostate cancer detection in obese patients.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2015; 20(6):1601-5. PubMed ID: 26854458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital rectal examination in primary care is important for early detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis study.
Walsh AL; Considine SW; Thomas AZ; Lynch TH; Manecksha RP
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Dec; 64(629):e783-7. PubMed ID: 25452543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is magnetic resonance imaging helpful in detecting significant prostate cancer in patients with haematospermia, normal prostate specific antigen level and digital rectal examination. A single institution, observational, and retrospective study in a United Kingdom hospital.
Turo R; Horsu S; Calinciuc A; Smolski M; Thygesen H; Doyle G; Gulur DM; Das S; Pettersson B; Awsare N
Cent European J Urol; 2018; 71(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 29732203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men.
Agalliu I; Weiss NS; Lin DW; Stanford JL
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Nov; 18(9):931-7. PubMed ID: 17641982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The risks of prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound guide biopsy in Thai men with abnormal prostatic-specific antigen or abnormal digital rectal examination.
Leewansangtong S; Tantiwong A; Ratanarapee S; Nualyong C; Soontrapa S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Dec; 83(12):1519-24. PubMed ID: 11253893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of hemospermia with prostate cancer.
Han M; Brannigan RE; Antenor JA; Roehl KA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 1):2189-92. PubMed ID: 15538229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prognostic value of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in patients over 70 years old with a prostate specific Antigen (PSA) level ≤ 15 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination: a 10-year prospective follow-up study of 427 consecutive patients.
Mohamed ZK; Dominguez-Escrig J; Vasdev N; Bharathan B; Greene D
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 22591749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination findings among participants in a prostate cancer screening clinic.
Price MM; Hamilton RJ; Robertson CN; Butts MC; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):787-91. PubMed ID: 18267334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The digital rectal examination (DRE) remains important - outcomes from a contemporary cohort of men undergoing an initial 12-18 core prostate needle biopsy.
Palmerola R; Smith P; Elliot V; Reese CT; Mahon FB; Harpster LE; Icitovic N; Raman JD
Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6542-7. PubMed ID: 23228289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The general practitioner's part in the initiation of diagnostic procedures in prostate cancer].
Braun KP; May M; Grassmel Y; Führer S; Hoschke B; Braun V
Aktuelle Urol; 2008 Mar; 39(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18379968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of digital rectal examination as a predictor of prostate cancer diagnosis among United States Veterans referred for prostate biopsy.
Issa MM; Zasada W; Ward K; Hall JA; Petros JA; Ritenour CW; Goodman M; Kleinbaum D; Mandel J; Marshall FF
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16844319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Haematospermia: diagnosis and treatment.
Szlauer R; Jungwirth A
Andrologia; 2008 Apr; 40(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 18336463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
