These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22683830)

  • 1. Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading.
    Bélanger NN; Slattery TJ; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 22683830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students.
    Tao J; Qin Z; Meng Z; Zhang L; Liu L; Yan G; Benson V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221891. PubMed ID: 31513606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers.
    Rayner K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1986 Apr; 41(2):211-36. PubMed ID: 3701249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.
    Bélanger NN; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2237-52. PubMed ID: 23768045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young Skilled Deaf Readers Have an Enhanced Perceptual Span in Reading.
    Bélanger NN; Lee M; Schotter ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; ():1-34. PubMed ID: 28447500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics.
    Yan M; Pan J; Bélanger NN; Shu H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 24999711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: evidence from reading Chinese as a second language.
    Wang A; Zhou W; Shu H; Yan M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():29-33. PubMed ID: 25103417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Targeting regressions: do readers pay attention to the left?
    Apel JK; Henderson JM; Ferreira F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 22791218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of visual span on reading speed and parafoveal processing in eye movements during sentence reading.
    Risse S
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):11. PubMed ID: 25027163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers.
    Fariña N; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():27-33. PubMed ID: 28646750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
    Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1457-506. PubMed ID: 19449261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye gaze during observation of static faces in deaf people.
    Watanabe K; Matsuda T; Nishioka T; Namatame M
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16919. PubMed ID: 21359223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The N170 ERP component differs in laterality, distribution, and association with continuous reading measures for deaf and hearing readers.
    Emmorey K; Midgley KJ; Kohen CB; Sehyr ZS; Holcomb PJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():298-309. PubMed ID: 28986268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English.
    Paterson KB; McGowan VA; White SJ; Malik S; Abedipour L; Jordan TR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88358. PubMed ID: 24586316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision.
    Moll K; Jones M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2085-91. PubMed ID: 24161215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual Statistical Learning With Stimuli Presented Sequentially Across Space and Time in Deaf and Hearing Adults.
    Giustolisi B; Emmorey K
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3177-3190. PubMed ID: 30320454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.