These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22683945)

  • 1. Analogue trauma results in enhanced encoding of threat information at the expense of neutral information.
    Krans J; Reinecke A; de Jong PJ; Näring G; Becker ES
    J Anxiety Disord; 2012 Aug; 26(6):656-64. PubMed ID: 22683945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fewer intrusions after an attentional bias modification training for perceptual reminders of analogue trauma.
    Verwoerd J; Wessel I; de Jong PJ
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 21707465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotionally negative pictures increase attention to a subsequent auditory stimulus.
    Tartar JL; de Almeida K; McIntosh RC; Rosselli M; Nash AJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 22015918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional Blink to emotional and threatening pictures in spider phobics: electrophysiology and behavior.
    Trippe RH; Hewig J; Heydel C; Hecht H; Miltner WH
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():149-60. PubMed ID: 17367765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing of unattended, simple negative pictures resists perceptual load.
    Sand A; Wiens S
    Neuroreport; 2011 May; 22(7):348-52. PubMed ID: 21464776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-lasting effects of briefly flashed words and pseudowords in ultrarapid serial visual presentation.
    Albrecht T; Vorberg D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1339-45. PubMed ID: 20804301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of dissociation on information processing for analogue trauma and neutral stimuli: a laboratory study.
    Olsen SA; Beck JG
    J Anxiety Disord; 2012 Jan; 26(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 22137464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli.
    Okon-Singer H; Tzelgov J; Henik A
    Emotion; 2007 Feb; 7(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 17352570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Target consolidation under high temporal processing demands as revealed by MEG.
    Kessler K; Schmitz F; Gross J; Hommel B; Shapiro K; Schnitzler A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1030-41. PubMed ID: 15961043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral vision and preferential emotion processing.
    De Cesarei A; Codispoti M; Schupp HT
    Neuroreport; 2009 Oct; 20(16):1439-43. PubMed ID: 19779383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial symptoms and reactions to trauma-related stimuli and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Elsesser K; Sartory G; Tackenberg A
    Depress Anxiety; 2005; 21(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 15782424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mood-specific effects in the allocation of attention across time.
    Rokke PD; Lystad CM
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(1):27-50. PubMed ID: 24597541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compelled attention: the effects of viewing trauma-related stimuli on concurrent task performance in posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Chemtob CM; Roitblat HL; Hamada RS; Muraoka MY; Carlson JG; Bauer GB
    J Trauma Stress; 1999 Apr; 12(2):309-26. PubMed ID: 10378168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging.
    Lee TY; Hsieh S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 19301162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in emotionality and peri-traumatic processing.
    Logan S; O'Kearney R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Jun; 43(2):815-22. PubMed ID: 22197753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.