194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22685259)
21. NMP-22, urinary cytology, and cystoscopy: a 1 year comparison study.
Schlake A; Crispen PL; Cap AP; Atkinson T; Davenport D; Preston DM
Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6345-50. PubMed ID: 22892257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of urine-based markers for detection and monitoring of bladder cancer.
Pirtskalaishvili G; Getzenberg RH; Konety BR
Tech Urol; 1999 Dec; 5(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 10591254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of tumours of the urinary tract in voided urine.
Zwarthoff EC
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2008 Sep; (218):147-53. PubMed ID: 18815929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immunocyt test improves the diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytology: results of a French multicenter study.
Pfister C; Chautard D; Devonec M; Perrin P; Chopin D; Rischmann P; Bouchot O; Beurton D; Coulange C; Rambeaud JJ
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):921-4. PubMed ID: 12576813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Urinary NMP22 BladderChek test in the diagnosis of superficial bladder cancer.
Moonen PM; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):951-6; discussion 956. PubMed ID: 16257108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Urinary cytology and quantitative BTA and UBC tests in surveillance of patients with pTapT1 bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Babjuk M; Soukup V; Pesl M; Kostírová M; Drncová E; Smolová H; Szakacsová M; Getzenberg R; Pavlík I; Dvorácek J
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 18387400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Agarwal A
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 10037369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Urinary vascular endothelial growth factor and its correlation with bladder cancer recurrence rates.
Crew JP; O'Brien T; Bicknell R; Fuggle S; Cranston D; Harris AL
J Urol; 1999 Mar; 161(3):799-804. PubMed ID: 10022687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical application of NMP22 in the management of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
Sawczuk IS; Bagiella E; Sawczuk AT; Yun EJ
Cancer Detect Prev; 2000; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 11059567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nuclear matrix protein-22: a prospective evaluation in a population at risk for bladder cancer. Results from the UroScreen study.
Huber S; Schwentner C; Taeger D; Pesch B; Nasterlack M; Leng G; Mayer T; Gawrych K; Bonberg N; Pelster M; Johnen G; Bontrup H; Wellhäusser H; Bierfreund HG; Wiens C; Bayer C; Eberle F; Scheuermann B; Kluckert M; Feil G; Brüning T; Stenzl A;
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 22313585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility study of screening for bladder cancer with urinary molecular markers (the BLU-P project).
Roobol MJ; Bangma CH; el Bouazzaoui S; Franken-Raab CG; Zwarthoff EC
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(6):686-90. PubMed ID: 21062653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The simultaneous use of telomerase, cytokeratin 20 and CD4 for bladder cancer detection in urine.
Siracusano S; Niccolini B; Knez R; Tiberio A; Benedetti E; Bonin S; Ciciliato S; Pappagallo GL; Belgrano E; Stanta G
Eur Urol; 2005 Mar; 47(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 15716196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer.
Parekattil SJ; Fisher HA; Kogan BA
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):917-20. PubMed ID: 12576812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic evaluation of apoptosis inhibitory gene and tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase-2 in patients with bladder cancer.
Eissa S; Shabayek MI; Ismail MF; El-Allawy RM; Hamdy MA
IUBMB Life; 2010 May; 62(5):394-9. PubMed ID: 20408180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Determination of NMP-22 as recurrence marker in bladder cancer. Preliminary study].
Pérez García FJ; Escaf Barmadah S; Fernández Gómez JM; Rodríguez Martínez JJ; Martín Benito JL
Arch Esp Urol; 2000 May; 53(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 10900760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can the burden of follow-up in low-grade noninvasive bladder cancer be reduced by photodynamic diagnosis, perioperative instillations, imaging, and urine markers?
Gakis G; Kruck S; Stenzl A
Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Sep; 20(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 20657287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of urinary cytokeratin 8 and 18 fragments compared with voided urine cytology in diagnosis of bladder carcinoma.
Hakenberg OW; Fuessel S; Richter K; Froehner M; Oehlschlaeger S; Rathert P; Meye A; Wirth MP
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 15596183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of urinary proepithelin as a potential biomarker for bladder cancer detection and prognosis in Egyptian patients.
Selmy MA; Ibrahim GH; El Serafi TI; Ghobeish AA
Cancer Biomark; 2010; 7(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 21263192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined morphologic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of voided urine samples for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer in patients with benign urine cytology.
Daniely M; Rona R; Kaplan T; Olsfanger S; Elboim L; Freiberger A; Lew S; Leibovitch I
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 111(6):517-24. PubMed ID: 17963263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparative evaluation of the predictive value of UroVysion and AURKA FISH tests of urine sediment cells for the diagnosis of bladder cancer].
Vorobtsova IE; Kouzova ED; Kolesnikova IS
Vopr Onkol; 2013; 59(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 24032224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
