184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22685393)
1. A platform-independent method for detecting errors in metagenomic sequencing data: DRISEE.
Keegan KP; Trimble WL; Wilkening J; Wilke A; Harrison T; D'Souza M; Meyer F
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(6):e1002541. PubMed ID: 22685393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DRISEE overestimates errors in metagenomic sequencing data.
Eren AM; Morrison HG; Huse SM; Sogin ML
Brief Bioinform; 2014 Sep; 15(5):783-7. PubMed ID: 23698723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the cPAS-based BGISEQ-500 platform for metagenomic sequencing.
Fang C; Zhong H; Lin Y; Chen B; Han M; Ren H; Lu H; Luber JM; Xia M; Li W; Stein S; Xu X; Zhang W; Drmanac R; Wang J; Yang H; Hammarström L; Kostic AD; Kristiansen K; Li J
Gigascience; 2018 Mar; 7(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 29293960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Illumina error profiles: resolving fine-scale variation in metagenomic sequencing data.
Schirmer M; D'Amore R; Ijaz UZ; Hall N; Quince C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():125. PubMed ID: 26968756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform.
Schirmer M; Ijaz UZ; D'Amore R; Hall N; Sloan WT; Quince C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(6):e37. PubMed ID: 25586220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of k-spectrum-based error correction methods for next-generation sequencing data analysis.
Akogwu I; Wang N; Zhang C; Gong P
Hum Genomics; 2016 Jul; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):20. PubMed ID: 27461106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeat-aware modeling and correction of short read errors.
Yang X; Aluru S; Dorman KS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S52. PubMed ID: 21342585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Denoising DNA deep sequencing data-high-throughput sequencing errors and their correction.
Laehnemann D; Borkhardt A; McHardy AC
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Jan; 17(1):154-79. PubMed ID: 26026159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis.
Ye Y; Tang H
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Jun; 7(3):455-71. PubMed ID: 19507285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QuorUM: An Error Corrector for Illumina Reads.
Marçais G; Yorke JA; Zimin A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130821. PubMed ID: 26083032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation based on shotgun metagenomic reads.
Xia LC; Cram JA; Chen T; Fuhrman JA; Sun F
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27992. PubMed ID: 22162995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly.
Breitwieser FP; Lu J; Salzberg SL
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 29028872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ADEPT, a dynamic next generation sequencing data error-detection program with trimming.
Feng S; Lo CC; Li PE; Chain PS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():109. PubMed ID: 26928302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial functional difference between microbial communities caused by length difference of sequencing reads.
Zhang Q; Doak TG; Ye Y
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():259-70. PubMed ID: 22174281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2-corrected 16S rDNA sequences.
Narayan NR; Weinmaier T; Laserna-Mendieta EJ; Claesson MJ; Shanahan F; Dabbagh K; Iwai S; DeSantis TZ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 31952477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Draft genome assemblies using sequencing reads from Oxford Nanopore Technology and Illumina platforms for four species of North American Fundulus killifish.
Johnson LK; Sahasrabudhe R; Gill JA; Roach JL; Froenicke L; Brown CT; Whitehead A
Gigascience; 2020 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 32556169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
