These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22686839)

  • 21. Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream.
    Endress AD; Bonatti LL
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):247-99. PubMed ID: 17083927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contextual variability and exemplar strength in phonotactic learning.
    Denby T; Schecter J; Arn S; Dimov S; Goldrick M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):280-294. PubMed ID: 28933893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.
    Kittredge AK; Dell GS
    J Mem Lang; 2016 Aug; 89():8-22. PubMed ID: 27840556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English.
    Cholin J; Dell GS; Levelt WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 21244111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: implications for a new model of speech production.
    Romani C; Galluzzi C; Bureca I; Olson A
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Mar; 62(2):151-92. PubMed ID: 21109241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
    White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Processing of syllables during handwriting: effects of graphomotor constraints.
    Sausset S; Lambert E; Olive T; Larocque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1872-9. PubMed ID: 22950838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials.
    Steinberg J; Truckenbrodt H; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20381548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    Lang Learn Dev; 2011; 7(4):287-308. PubMed ID: 22511851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nonword repetition in children and adults: effects on movement coordination.
    Sasisekaran J; Smith A; Sadagopan N; Weber-Fox C
    Dev Sci; 2010 May; 13(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 20443972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.
    Cholin J; Levelt WJ; Schiller NO
    Cognition; 2006 Mar; 99(2):205-35. PubMed ID: 15939415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural sensitivity to syllable frequency and mutual information in speech perception and production.
    Tremblay P; Deschamps I; Baroni M; Hasson U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 136():106-21. PubMed ID: 27184201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
    Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How children learn to organize their speech gestures: further evidence from fricative-vowel syllables.
    Nittrouer S; Studdert-Kennedy M; Neely ST
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 8729924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual constancy of vowels in rapid speech.
    Johnson TL; Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Dec; 72(6):1761-70. PubMed ID: 7153423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.
    Buchwald A; Calhoun H; Rimikis S; Lowe MS; Wellner R; Edwards DJ
    Cortex; 2019 Feb; 111():274-285. PubMed ID: 30551048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech segmentation is facilitated by visual cues.
    Cunillera T; Camara E; Laine M; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 19526435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonotactic constraints: Implications for models of oral reading in Russian.
    Ulicheva A; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Perry C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):636-56. PubMed ID: 26641449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints.
    Taylor CF; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1398-416. PubMed ID: 16393054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Errors in short-term memory for speech: a developmental study.
    Treiman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1197-208. PubMed ID: 8744961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.